Strawman, nevertheless I'll answer Hezbollah rockets don't have the 99% accuracy of Israel missiles. Israel fired 100 missiles, you do the math. BTW would you feel better if Israel stop using precision guided missiles?
Some 150 rockets were fired from the Lebanese village of Qana over the past 20 days, Air Force Chief of Staff Brig.-Gen. Amir Eshel said on Sunday evening. Speaking to reporters, Eshel added that Hizbullah rocket launchers were hidden in civilian buildings in the village. He proceeded to show video footage of rocket launchers being driven into the village following launches. Eshel also pointed out that the building was hit sometime around midnight Saturday night and didn't collapse until about 8 a.m. Sunday morning, leaving an unusual gap in the timing of the events which the IDF was investigating. "It's possible that inside the house, something or other was being stored that caused an explosion - something that we didn't succeed in blowing up in the [initial] attack and that perhaps was left over there," Eshel said. "I say this very cautiously, because I currently don't have the faintest idea what the explanation for this gap could be." http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1153292036218&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
I want to see a trial where all the evidence is presented. What would the charges be? Similar to those who killed while drunk driving, manslaughter. LOL, you want them sued and you have no clue what to charge them with. Negligent homicide...at best. Why shouldn't negligence be punished, especially when children unnecessarily die. That is why there are war crimes trials, and investigations, to determine if the decisions made were reasonable. I doubt at this point that most would believe that Israel would thoroughly investigate their own mistakes. As I said I have no problem with that, let them investigate and prosecute all war crimes by all countries in chronological order. Or at the very least all sides involved in this war - Hezbollah, Lebanon, Hamas, Syria, Iran, the United Nations, the United States and Israel. Chronological order is not necessary. A preceding criminal act doesn't make another criminal act in retaliation right. Either Israel is innocent, or they are not. Even in something as simple as sporting events, the actions of an instigator do not absolve the penalty of one who responds with an infraction... Refs don't look at an infraction and decide if someone "deserved" it as a justifiable retaliation. Everybody who disagrees with Israel is an idiot? Strawman, I said people believing in the Islamic David are idiots. So if someone disagrees with your point of view on the analogy, they are idiots?
I would feel better if both sides stopped firing missiles, guided or not, and yes, I don't believe Hezbollah's wrong make Israel right...
In this case, given the pattern of "mistakes" a request for proof against claim of innocence is reasonable, and intellectually honest... Cops ask for alibis all time when a crime has been committed.
Negligent homicide...at best. Why shouldn't negligence be punished, especially when children unnecessarily die. LOL, I can't believe you suggested that, the Hague court does not prosecute "negligent homicide" cases, it's not part of the international law or the Geneva convention. Of course Israel will investigate the incident and negligent homicide charges may indeed be pressed against Israeli officials based on Israeli laws. Not that you'll accept its findings. Chronological order is not necessary. You bet it's necessary. The law can't be applied selectively if you want it to be taken seriously and be considered fair and unbiased. No country will agree to stand trial for actions that absolutely everyone else gets away with. It's not a matter of guilt but a matter of principle, no country (including Israel) will agree to become a scapegoat. So if someone disagrees with your point of view on the analogy, they are idiots? Strawman, I said those who believe in the Muslim David are idiots. That's my personal opinion so feel free to consider them geniuses.
Negligent homicide...at best. Why shouldn't negligence be punished, especially when children unnecessarily die. LOL, I can't believe you suggested that, the Hague court does not prosecute "negligent homicide" cases, it's not part of the international law or the Geneva convention. Of course Israel will investigate the incident and negligent homicide charges may indeed be pressed against Israeli officials based on Israeli laws. Not that you'll accept its findings. I suggest the Hague look to war crimes, and civil courts deal with the possible civil punishments. Chronological order is not necessary. You bet it's necessary. The law can't be applied selectively if you want it to be taken seriously and be considered fair and unbiased. No country will agree to stand trial for actions that absolutely everyone else gets away with. It's not a matter of guilt but a matter of principle, no country (including Israel) will agree to become a scapegoat. I bet it is unnecessary. Either there are facts to support a conviction, or there aren't. Israel is free to present their evidence to excuse them of the crime for which they are charged. Chronological order of another trial is not necessary in the trial process of a defendant. I contend that both sides are wrong, so it doesn't matter who goes first. So if someone disagrees with your point of view on the analogy, they are idiots? Strawman, I said those who believe in the Muslim David are idiots. That's my personal opinion so feel free to consider them geniuses. You really don't understand what a strawman fallacy is, do you?
I suggest the Hague look to war crimes What part of "negligent homicide is not a war crime" do you not understand? Either there are facts to support a conviction, or there aren't. and you'll never find out until you start prosecuting everyone suspected of the crime. Until that time Israel is innocent until proven guilty and what you or I think about it is completely irrelevant.