How Obamanomics will bring us to prosperity!

Discussion in 'Economics' started by dinoman, Dec 27, 2008.

  1. One day Johnny Joe Businessman had to make a choice as to where he was to start a business....He had two choices....

    1) The first choice was a world whereby the governments took over 50% of all incomes....and spent their take on non-productive activities....

    2) The second choice was a world whereby the governments took 10% of the price of all physical products sold by businesses....and the government only spent revenues on assets that helped businesses become more productive....

    No monopolies or oligopolies were allowed....

    Which choice will Johnny Joe Businessman make ?

    ........................................................................................

    The Obama Admin makes the first choice....

    And Obama is a self made lawyer....to be admired as a self made man....and not to be admired as making the right choice with respect to making the US a stronger nation....
     
    #11     Dec 29, 2008
  2. Most borrowing still occurs from the Fed, hence printed money. Just look at M3 for evidence.
    He does fail to address foreign borrowing. But if he did, it would not be pretty. That money has to actually be repaid, and the reality is that there are no funds for it. If there were projects viable enough for the investment, the government would not need to be involved. The truth is that Keynesian economics (aka central planning) injects money into unfruitful projects.

    You know who loves Keynesian economics? Bureaucrats & government contractors. It's the money faucet, lots of funds to embezzle.
     
    #12     Dec 29, 2008
  3. Maybe, but yours aren't any closer either.

    You have to separate the last 100 years from the previous 100 years. Then you take the previous 100 years and take detailed looks at the periods with central banks and Andrew Jackson's battles with them.

    I know this is hard to accept, but USA is finished. Yeah, hard reality to accept for those in denial, but it is over and it has been over for quite a while. Just a matter of the final act to unfold as the play has been written long before.
    2009 will make it apparent to the masses. And even after that, it's how the saying goes: "You ain't seen nothing yet"
     
    #13     Dec 29, 2008
  4. bellman

    bellman

    What? I thought Reagan had long been established the greatest American president of all time!
    :confused: :confused: :confused:


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Quote from Random.Capital:

    *cough* Reagan *cough*
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


     
    #14     Dec 29, 2008
  5. Your ignorance is vast. There's no such economic theory as "trickle-down". You would know that if you knew the very first thing about economics.

    Bush's policies were ANYTHING but free market and they were most certainly not supply-side. You would also know that if you had the smallest clue about economics. "obamanomics" will be a continuation of Bush's interventionist, big government, demand side, socialist policies. How's that been working for you?

    Since you know absolutely nothing, you are can't understand what you observe and you have no competence to measure and understand, rendering your post useless. Thanks for the drivel.
     
    #15     Dec 29, 2008
  6. During most of those 200 years, the US had very protectionist trade policies.
     
    #16     Dec 29, 2008
  7. Here's the problem:

    When you have guys in the papers (like Krugman) saying that the free market has failed...

    When you have people like Greenspan -- you know Ayn RAND students -- saying that the free market has failed...

    When you have people like Cramer and Kudlow, etc, saying that "free market" has been in effect for years...

    When none of that shit has been true, of course you are going to have the uninformed asking if the free market has failed!

    People are being lied to, saying that the free market has failed when it was not given a chance due to government intervention.

    Oh well...
     
    #17     Dec 29, 2008
  8. I agree with you. However, if someone is going to claim to "analyze the data" then this person is essentially saying that he knows more than the average monkey. Then, he goes on to prove that he is a below average monkey. Sad.

    This does bring up another point though: these monkeys vote and this is how they reason. I bet they also think that America is not a republic but a democracy and that's a problem because the political class has far less constraints on it in a democracy (the very reason the founding fathers chose to make this country a republic). We're screwed.
     
    #18     Dec 29, 2008
  9. dinoman

    dinoman

    Nice to see others that can see through the lies of "we have been living in a free market".
     
    #19     Dec 29, 2008
  10. BVM88

    BVM88

    <embed src="http://blip.tv/play/Ad3iNAA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="390" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed>
     
    #20     Dec 29, 2008