How much should you risk?

Discussion in 'Risk Management' started by kut2k2, Feb 1, 2016.

  1. There is a closed form solution (it's just maximising some logs, so differentiable) but I just did it in excel which is much quicker.

    GAT
     
    #51     Feb 3, 2016
  2. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    I still wonder why your excel solution to the OP puzzle was so off.
     
    #52     Feb 3, 2016
  3. Only the one for the first two moments was wrong ( the full distributional one was correct). And I didn't even use excel for that, just the nearest envelope.

    GAT
     
    #53     Feb 3, 2016
  4. Visaria

    Visaria

    Yeah, it's a 2 min job in excel.
     
    #54     Feb 3, 2016
  5. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    No. It wasn't. botpro gave the correct answer.
     
    #55     Feb 3, 2016
  6. In my world 77.793% versus 75% means diddly squat....

    GAT
     
    #56     Feb 3, 2016
    bleau likes this.
  7. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    So how did you get 99.4% for the next puzzle?
     
    #57     Feb 3, 2016
  8. In the first puzzle I just read the peak off a graph.

    In the second puzzle I used solver to get a more precise answer.

    While this is intellectually interesting, you and I both know that in the real world you'd be lucky to know your correct Kelly to within an order of magnitude.

    GAT
     
    #58     Feb 3, 2016
  9. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    The new Kelly formula does better than an order of magnitude in the real world. And it's perfectly safe at half-Kelly.
     
    #59     Feb 3, 2016
  10. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    No closed solution for the puzzle in the OP. Too many outcomes.
     
    #60     Feb 3, 2016