If they are smarter why do they have to complain about how unfair the world is against them? Wouldn't they already have insured that they are always on top in every sense? I think many women now who have entered the workforce in order to be independent are starting to realize that perhaps this wasn't such a good trade for Independence.
Women's brainpower is best used to raise kids which they use to secure resources as well as protect their kids. That's way more intelligent than what men do interpersonally. How many men you know got rich from divorce vs women. So tell me again how women are not smarter than men.
Nah, because MacBookProHo, who just joined the site yesterday, has me all figured out apparently. Seek guidance from him/her, who is so obviously a previous nick it's been reported.
I couldn't agree more... In this context. But let's say the goal is marriage and a family. If she spends her life climbing the corporate ladder, to prove she is so smart, and then finds out that nobody wants to marry her because she is too old, then how smart is she really for not attaining the main goal that she wanted? If men aren't good interpersonally, then so be it, you don't see us trying to take this role over from women. But what we do see is women trying to take over the things that men are good at in the name of equality.
It sounds to me like you are missing what I assume to be the most obvious reason. And this is that the market just did something else regardless of how good the setup was. If you will be shorting support like you said you try and do, can you really tell in advance which of the times the breakdown will have lots of momentum and which of the times the breakdown fizzles out very quickly and price shoots back up?
The market is not random, that means the analysis was wrong. If I wanted to make sure that I could control the vast majority of men, I would turn their women against them. Nothing more, nothing less. That's all what is happening.
Overnight, you have been a straight shooter so I was puzzled as to how he would have a strong opinion since he just joined ET yesterday. Made no sense to me. So you think it is a current ET member getting a 2nd account and posting as though he is a different person. Is that what I hear you saying?
That is my belief, yes. No new registered user, a day old, comes on here and claims to know my trading style after a day. They would have to read through my journal to determine my style and formulate an opinion about me, and that cannot be done in a day. Since my journal is 5 years old, they would have a TON of material to scroll through to be able to do that. It would take so long, in fact, that even as an anonymous user without registering, they would have felt the urge to register way before yesterday to "chime in". That is my gut feel. Seen it before, it reeks of that situation. (Either that, or it is a previously-banned nick.) In any case, neither of those situations is allowed. He's coming across as engaging in other threads, but that first interaction with me was the red flag.
I still want to know why you think increasing trading size will blow my mind up? You think I will go too much too soon? Or do you think there is an absolute level (maybe different for each person) that is just too much and just the size alone affects trading decisions to the point you trade differently and begin to lose?