We don’t care about you Views are not yours. In 5 days this thread’s gonna die. Anyway ... Short term victory are for fools. Let him win the the battle. And take the war away from him.
Well, NOT according to @themickey who placed importance on "VIEWS". To directly quote him: "7000 views in this thread, there ya go mate, an audience to swing to. " I guess his audience estimates are being surpassed! CONGRATS! PS. @Sekiyo Spoken like a true Zen Master...
But 9,500 Views!!! And it's not even in "This Week's Most Viewed Threads". Something is weird, and I was psyched for that 10K Mark
The Efficient Market Hypothesis is a bit of a joke when you think about it, how can one ever know that every bit of information is reflected via price? One might argue every known bit of information is reflected in the price, but known to who? There was a discussion on this recently by the 'founder' of the theory (Fama) and probably the biggest name in Behavioural Economics (Thaler) - Basically you cannot ever test the Hypothesis, so it is pretty worthless. That said, if you believe that all information you need to know is contained in the price..... Well, then one can study price and use that to determine likely future moves and ignore everything else...
...Ok, will do. i like to use the 200sma as a target sometimes when taking a trade between the fitty and 200, in the direction of the 200, know what i mean vern?
Edward Thorp said market is not efficient and we need to figure out the efficiencies that give us edge over the market.
You are indeed correct, EMF and both Fama are an Absolute Joke! For better insights: http://www.edwardothorp.com/ Fama is a loser, and Thorp is a winner...
because he will not make money doing that. the bigger player wants to make money and he will not get it by destroying everyone in the market place