How high can the S&P go?

Discussion in 'Trading' started by Romeo, Sep 17, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Your EGO is even BIGGER than I first thought!

    Wow!!!

    :D
     
    #471     Nov 21, 2003
  2. And by the way, I've seen the STONES and MICK JAGGER in concert before and I hate to break it to ya kid, but you ain't no MICK JAGGER!

    :D :D :D
     
    #472     Nov 21, 2003
  3. Hope you had good seats for the Stones Waggie because you've been watching this break fom the highs on the Jumbotron.:D

    Wags, you're a smart guy, very! You're remarks on index volitility compression were among the best researched posts ever on this board. However Romeo/Nolan was bullish all spring/early summer, and repeatedly called for this 1050-1060 high in SPX. Give the guy his props. Plus he respects the President's efforts to erradicate terror from the lives of our children.

    On a board full of crap, you two guys are amoungst the best poster's here. Let's talk about our common passions for analysis and intuition, not backbiting.
     
    #473     Nov 21, 2003
  4. Romeo

    Romeo

    Thank you, Maureen. I appreciate that. Unfortunately, there are too few of your types that can call them down the line, and too many waggles who are ready to pounce, no matter how accurate the prediction may be. It really serves as a deterrant to post anything of substance.

    I mean, why do I want to share great predictions here if the best that can happen is maggots like waggle crawl from under their rocks to distort my record. And the worst that can happen is..well thankfully I haven't been wrong yet, so I haven't seen the worst.
     
    #474     Nov 23, 2003
  5. I have no problem with people expressing opinions regarding market-direction, asset-allocation, trading styles, etc., but in my book this thread has never been about anyone else but YOU and YOUR BIG FAT EGO.

    You and your FAREWELLS, GOODBYES, AND AUFWIEDERSEHENS have gotten to be rather boring.

    Everyone has seen how deeply INSECURE you are and how much your big fat EGO needs to be fed. The fact that you have come back once, twice, and three more times after saying "goodbye" and pounding your chest as the greatest there is, is really getting quite boring, not too mention lacks credibility, Rollings Stones or no Rolling Stones!

    If you think that you are so good, then write a market-letter and charge money for it. But please spare us from all of the ridiculous curtain calls that you need in order to feed your EGO.

    Most of us on ET see right through this.

    :D
     
    #475     Nov 23, 2003
  6. Pabst

    Pabst

    Wags,

    I vehemently disagree with your above statement. Romeo's are obviously in jest with just a touch of good natured New York braggadocio. His feel this year has been a hell of alot better than most any market writer's and his opinions are free! Take guy's like Romeo off this board and you're left with ChitChat.
     
    #476     Nov 23, 2003
  7. Romeo

    Romeo

    Dude, you can put all the words you want in capitals, and you can tell me what you think and say you speak for "us". But I got two words for you (besides "pathetic loser").

    "Ignore button"

    Obviously you want a confrontation. Or you would ignore this thread.

    So you want a confrontation? You got one!

    And since you seem to be mentally challenged, I say to you, "Romeo's predictions are OVER". So when I said good-bye, it was a REAL good-bye. That's right, no more predictions. Say good-bye to them. That's real.

    But i'm still around, and i'm ready to confront and battle you. Why? Because that's fun.

     
    #477     Nov 23, 2003
  8. You might be right.

    I just think that Romeo would be much more "effective" if he stuck to his word, leaving the thread with the "closure" that he had originally stated on October 22nd rather than falling into the trap of feeding his EGO with more and more posts that add very little value.

    In the end, the thread becomes an exercise in massaging one's EGO . . . Nothing more, nothing less.
     
    #478     Nov 23, 2003
  9. Romeo

    Romeo

    Why would I leave a thread that has been here for 2 months and is still proven to be totally accurate? Because you say so?? In case you haven't noticed Einstein, the "1050 or thereabouts" is still the correct answer, and if you were a real trader, you would be begging me for more pinpoint accuracy. Only a jealous lame brain would discount what this thread has predicted.

    You been talking to dumbassphoenix lately?

    As far as massaging one's ego, that's another moronic comment. I've said very little about my accomplishments in the world of trading. Sure, I could brag and brag, but I haven't. I could brag about a long history of profitability, and an audited track record, but I haven't. I could brag about other successses, but I haven't. Ask Inandlong if you think i jest.

    To Inandlong, if this moron does ask you, just give him a "yes" or "no" please. I don't want it to seem like I'm bragging.
     
    #479     Nov 23, 2003
  10. Romeo

    Romeo

    this maggot is either dumbassphoenix, or a dumbassphoenix clone. He talks from BOTH sides of his mouth. Just as phoenix was busted by Johhny Rotten for saying "he was done with it", and then going on and on about Johnny, this moron waaggle does the same thing.

    The above quote implies that waggl is NOW saying that "in the end" i'm massaging my ego by going on. But look closely at this thread, wiggle has been saying this "ego" thing over and over AS the thread progressed. You are busted big time, loser! You have no credibility when you talk from both sides of your mouth.
     
    #480     Nov 23, 2003
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.