as i mentioned above, i am looking at a different form of scaling-in, entering against the current price movement. however, this second mention of scaling into trend has prompted me to take a fresh look at the Turtle rules. it's very interesting, according to the rules, the Turtles scaled in equal increments and had the same stop loss for each scale-in piece. so, they kept a constant level of risk for each scaled entry, which is what i am assuming as a goal, i.e. i am not seeing a rationale (or i don't have one) to increase / decrease risk (or risk / return for that matter) during the process of scaling. hence, what i am concluding is that the goal is to keep a target level or risk (and/or risk/return) and then assume a probability distribution and solve for the scale-in size which maintains the desired level of risk.
you are considering only one type of probability, the probability of getting filled on a scale-in piece; i am also considering the probability of getting stopped out and the amount of stop loss which are all variable for each scale-in level. one would have to assume a probability distribution and then model these variables, so far i have put together some preliminary scenarios but i am seeing only more risk from scaling-in at an increasing rate which seems to be what most people do; i'll have to look at some more material, there must be a problem with my logic.
Important thread. If you have a problem in taking profits ie always taking profits too early, then scaling in makes a great positive difference to the end result. Not mathematically but psychologically. By scaling in we are always looking to buy as opposed to sell.
u should also focus on scaling out, exit price is more important thats entry price, in matter fact u can even make money from random entries if ur exits are good enough
Interesting timing regarding the re-emergence of this thread. Similarly low levels of volatility in 2006 as now...a "drift up" kind of market, etc, etc...
This thread wins the award for oldest-one revived I think. Last post before Sunday was about 10 years 9 months ago. Bravo Newc2!
This is a good strategy only when you don't currently have the money to invest ie like retirement investing/401k. Scaling is not a superior tactic when trading.
%% Good points, not that the Paul Tudor Jones quote is too much of a blanket statement.[ Losers average losers.]As you implied , use discretion, with any quote.I agree with much of your post, not that you would want to average down , @ the inflection ,when a bear changes in to a bull market, Buy1Sell 2. My comments did not apply to any single stock, but large size mutual fund managers who get paid on the gross , average down all the time .LOL