If you can't dazzle people with brilliance you can baffle them with BS. Back at ya, but you need to know more than one thing to be confused.
Why don't you look it up yourself, you obviously don't have RSI, just a lack of mental capacity to do intelligent research yourself. The wonders of having an eidetic memory, I remember your idiotic non-answer posts from before.
That's hardly fair. You post a "fact" and then it's someone elses job to do their own research to prove you are correct??? It's like dealing with D J Trump As it happens I did google "R versus Python trading system contest" and variations thereof and nothing relevant came back. GAT
You all know a programming language is merely a tool. It does absolutely nothing by self. Just like any other tool. RSI is a trading strategy or methodology or framework, call as you may. It must work independent of any programming language to be successful and profitable. All programming can do is automate repetitive parts of an algos. Regardless of any programming language, a fool with a tool is still a fool ...
I absolutely agree. Birzos was the one talking about how R is more "profitable" (his words) than Python. There's no research on this and birzos refuses to provide any evidence himself. This is on the same level as debating with religious people, asking for proof is handled with misdirection. Apparently birzos' opinion without any basis makes things factual.
Why are you & GAT even wasting your time replying to this absurd, nonsensical claim? It's beneath both of you.
Excellent, set the technicals off, always fascinating to watch. It's only not fair if you know less than the person making the statement. Do you know what separates the wealthy from everyone else, they use time more efficiently. Given that I know the responses are from technical minded people, why would I explain the concepts of fundamental choices when that is not their field of expertise or their chosen route. So we come full circle back to the OP, R is better than Python and Python is better than Java & C from a business perspective. The inverse is true going from a technical view, so each person needs to judge for themselves which uses their technical/fundamental combination most efficiently. Because the markets are about making as much money, in as little time, with the least effort, and my own personal twist, as honestly as possible. So if you use a programming language which is inefficient for your knowledge combination all that happens is you end up poor not wealthy which links directly to one simple statement "time is money".
For the same reason we should call out lying politicians. Less well informed people might believe this dangerous nonsense. GAT