How come goldman sachs, as a bank is still allowed to trade as a non bank?

Discussion in 'Economics' started by mahram, Oct 12, 2009.

  1. Goldman Sachs CFO just sent an email to Goldman employees announcing that the bank was now a "financial holding company."

    The designation of Goldman as a Financial Holding Company was granted by the Federal Reserve on August 14th, according to a person familiar wth the matter. Goldman only announced the news today because it wanted to avoid pre-empting the official announcement by the Federal Reserve, which only announces changes in designation periodically.

    Goldman had said it planned to seek FHC status when it first converted to a Bank Holding Company. The designation allows a bank to engage in non-banking, financial activitties. Of course, Goldman has been doing this all along under temporary permission from the Fed.

    "It's a natural progression from being a Bank Holding Company," Goldman Sachs spokesman Lucas Van Praag told us. "We've said it was our intention to become a FHC since becoming a BHC (check our most recent 10-K for more on the subject). FHCs are permitted to engage in a broad range of financial and other activities. We do not expect that our change of status will materially affect our business strategy."

    Apparently many banks, including Fifth Third and Bank of America, are both Bank Holding Companies and Financial Holding Companies. Morgan Stanley applied to become a financial holding company long ago.

    "The email says that Goldman is now 'a type of bank holding company that is permitted to engage in a broad range of financial and related activities," one Goldman insider tells us. "Which is murky!"
     
    #11     Oct 12, 2009