You toggle a line, man. Now you want people to disprove fanciful stories you submit and claim are filled with “information.” Let me ask you a real question, in a room with your bosses, would you cite this article for any reason as a source of information?
Some sources should not be listened to. People should not be constantly proving that stories fables put out by fake new purveyors are false. Anything from "news outlets" should be assumed to be false -- the "news outlet" needs to come up with some proper evidence that the crap they are peddling is factual.
No. But I would bring it up as a humorous anecdote at the bar later on. Because the bar is more akin to this forum, with more alcohol. Hell, some of you folks might actually be tolerable if I was liquored up around you.
Perhaps. But in an election where 10s of millions of people believe the election was stolen we should be going over and beyond to disprove the stories and not just say "its fake, shut up and accept it". That is, if you cared about the future of the country. Based on your COVID stance, I already know the answer to that question.
Ah, yes. The Russians did it again. Where's your proof of that? Wait, wait...lemme guess. Salon? Vox?
Fake news is not limited to tabloid sources, it’s spewed out daily in the MSM. Just because some so called “credible” source reports a jaded view of the facts, or reports their opinions as fact, doesn’t mean they are being truthful with their viewers.