Housing Soft Landing

Discussion in 'Economics' started by 2cents, Aug 31, 2006.

  1. toc

    toc

    'I am expecting a pretty damn big reaction from the market as the air comes whoosing out of the bubble.'

    Why people call housing a bubble? For the last 50 years housing prices have risen 4-6%/year not including inflation. If that is true for the prices of housing in 2006 going back several decades then there is no bubble.

    Look forward to more inputs and links from other ET folks regarding valuations of the housing markets.
     
    #11     Sep 11, 2006
  2. TRADERBM

    TRADERBM

    what time frame do you see before we see a big sell off in the housing market?

    I have heard there has been a 25% decrease from the highs a year ago but I cannot substantiate this. Just conversation with people.

    your thoughts?
     
    #12     Sep 11, 2006
  3. jem

    jem

    The national media seems to focus on the average price of a home. I would never consider that price to be an accurate indication of what is really go on in the market place.

    A buyer who has 500 to spend is just going to buy a bigger house as prices fall 9 times out of 10.

    By the way how are shillers indices made. I hope he is smarter than using average home price.
     
    #13     Sep 11, 2006
  4. toc

    toc

    Visit this link and find more info. on housing prices etc. I did not read it but might be good for someone willing to spend time.

    http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/
     
    #14     Sep 11, 2006
  5. He is using the average re-sale home prices. OFHEO is also using the same method but applies it to a much smaller data sample (comforming loans).
     
    #15     Sep 11, 2006
  6. 2 Cents likes Roubini so much that I thought I would post his latest missive.


    How Much Will Home Prices Fall During This Housing Bust? At Least 20% to 30%!
    Nouriel Roubini | Sep 10, 2006

    Now it is clear even to reality-blindfolded perma-bulls that housing is not going through a “soft landing” or an “orderly adjustment” but rather through an ugly and nasty bust, as severe as we have seen in decades. Soon enough the only thing “soft” or “orderly” about this comatose housing market will be the undertaker carrying the coffin.


    Last month I argued that “this will be the worst housing bust - calling it slump is too mild - in decades. And since median home prices may actually fall on a year-on-year basis in 2007 - something that has not happened since the Great Depression of the 1930s - this may end up being the biggest housing bust in the last 75 years, not just 40 years as the Toll Brothers argue or 53 years as Countrywide argues”.


    And guess what? Now even the cheerleaders representing the housing sector are now finally admitting that home prices will fall – on a year on year basis - for the first time since 1933. The evidence that home prices are falling are mounting: median home prices – based on NAR data - are already falling for three of the four regions of the US: North East, West and even the supposedly non-bubbly Mid West. Perma-bulls got relief from the recent OFHEO figure that showed still positive price increase in Q2; too bad that the figure was an average of three months and that we are already in September, not in March when the current bust was just starting. Also, even the OFHEO figures show a sharp deceleration of price growth; and those figures – long favored by the Fed as being “unbiased” by composition change - s are actually the most biased at all as they exclude the most frothy part of the housing market: condos, co-ops and any home with mortgage above $470,000, i.e. they exclude all the McMansions and other middle to high priced properties.



    But more importantly, seller’s incentives – that are now estimated to be 3% to 8% of the selling price are becoming pathetically ridiculous: $30,000 swimming pools given away for free; even gift certificates worth $99,000 or 40% off mortgage payments (YES 40%; this is not a typo). Soon enough, desperate homebuilders are likely to give you a “two for one: buy one home, get the other one for free” deals. Sellers are doing everything – via such seller-side incentives and subsidies – to pretend that home prices are falling; indeed, it is supposed to be bad omen to show in any local housing market that prices are falling (as buyers may then wait to buy at the bottom); thus, spin-master realt estate builders and brokers are now climbing on mirrors to distort the data and hide the simple truth – that is evident to anyone who has even one functioning eye - that prices are already sharply falling everywhere in the U.S.. As an industry representative put it “non-price” incentives (what an Orwellian double talk) are going “beserk”; even David Seiders, chief economist for the National Association of Home Builders says that 75 percent of the nation's builders and developers are offering incentives. (hat tip to Calculated Risk)


    It is really a pathetic joke bordering on a lie for the desperate perma-bulls to argue – as they are still doing – that home prices are not yet falling but just softening; in which delusional dream world are they living? How can they argue with a straight face that this is a soft landing and that prices are not falling? What is a $99,000 gift certificate on properties that are going for as low as $300,000? That is a 33% price fall in the language of first grade math.


    These facts, together with every other possible indicator – including futures prices that project a 5% price fall in 2007 – suggests that home price will keep on falling for the next two or three years. The only question at this point is not whether home prices will fall but, rather, the speed at which they are falling and will fall further and how much they will fall overall. There is now an ugly glut of new homes and the total supply is still sharply increasing as many construction developments that were started about a year ago - before the current bust started - will be literally dumped in the market in the next six months. Thus, the glut of unsold homes will become much worse in the next 12 months than the already ugly oversupply and glut that we have now. Thus, the worst of the glut and housing rout is ahead of us.


    My own prediction is that, over the next two years, real home prices will fall by at least 20% and possibly by 30%. What is my prediction based on? Let me provide my analysis and explanation.



    The rest of this blog/paper is available only to registered users of the RGE Monitor.

    http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/145489/
     
    #16     Sep 11, 2006
  7. jem

    jem

    Shiller is not as smart as he thinks he is.
    Thanks for the info.
     
    #17     Sep 11, 2006
  8. Decrease of what? Average Housing prices across the nation? West coast average housing prices? Average sale volume?
     
    #18     Sep 11, 2006
  9. Never happen. The Fed would step in and lower rates again long before that. They'd have to do so because of a negative wealth effect choking the economy. I don't believe we'll see anything even close to those price drops on a national basis (i.e,, across the nation).

    The thinking is too linear, and doesn't consider the markets reponses. The housing slow down was created, and it can be un-created by the same people. This kind of thinking reminds me of an old joke about a guy in a four engine airplane hearing a call from the captain over the intercom that an engine just blew out so it will add another hour to the flight. Then after a while, the captain comes on again, and says engine number 2 went out and it will add another hour to the flight. Later, the third engine goes bad, and the captain says that they'll be making an unscheduled landing in another hour. Then the fourth engine goes out and the impatient traveler says, "Dammit, we'll be up here all day!"

    SM
     
    #19     Sep 12, 2006
  10. when are you guys gonna get it - people don't work anymore - they just extract credit card advances and home equity
     
    #20     Sep 12, 2006