When you vote for a candidate, you ARE supporting that candidate. You also admitted you are physically attracted to her.
You know , jem, technically you are right. If we are going to be as accurate as possible we will use the term plurality because there is often more than two candidates on the ballot. Please feel free to change every where i said "minority" to "non-plurality". There now, is that better? Now, would you like to tell us how many people became president without winning the popular vote? (By the way, "winning" means got more votes than anyone else.) Do you know why I ignore the other candidates and treat the election as if there were only two candidates running? No, I suppose you don't. Well think of it this way suppose a third candidate got a significant number of votes so that the vote was split more or less evenly between the two parties and an independent. Lets even suppose that the Independent got the most votes! Who do you think would win the election then. Good guess! That's right! It would be either the Democrat or the Republican, depending on which party controlled the House. Jem, we are not a Democracy at the Federal level. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unite...ons_in_which_the_winner_lost_the_popular_vote
I believe you would be the Enron stock on this board. Let's just say I don't buy the Kool aid like some do on here when it comes to your judgement and integrity.
Below, as discussed. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ning-deal-on-dreamers/?utm_term=.605c1ec83998