House Panel Approves $10B for the Wall.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by peilthetraveler, Oct 5, 2017.

  1. piezoe

    piezoe

    Hell yes, I'd take Perlman over trump any day, and I barely know who Perlman is. I'd take my neighbor's dog, Charlie, over Trump. And Charlie speaks English worse than Trump! Hell, I'd even take our Vice President, what's his name?; oh yah, that's right , 'Pence', over Trump. If there is not a better indicator of desperation than that, I don't know what it is!
     
    #31     Oct 5, 2017
    Slartibartfast and Tony Stark like this.
  2. jem

    jem

    whether that is true or not is irrelevant.

    I am not arguing that much of the country was taken in by bad polling or a stealth Trump vote... although we told you the election was really in the margin for error when you adjusted the polls to a good template like the 2012 election.



    The point I am making is we are tired of Tony lying his ass off acting like he was only predicting a popular vote win and he was only off by a little.

    No...

    Tony was posting about 98 percent chance of hillary winning the electoral college just 2 or 3 days before the election.

    he and his sources were dead ass wrong on the electoral college too.




     
    #32     Oct 5, 2017
  3. jem

    jem

    you are misrepresenting thing again.
    plus you are comparing banter or predictions to your lies an misrepresentations about what you said just a few nights before the election.

    there is no comparision Tony... you are misrepresenting your ass off.
    you were posting predictions about the electoral college not just the popular vote.



     
    #33     Oct 5, 2017
  4. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    I was predicting a Hillary win,I never denied that moron.I was off on that prediction by 78,000 in The EC and in the popular vote I was right by millions of votes.

    I never said Hillary had a 98 % chance of winning.I posted multiple polls and the opinions of multiple pundits one of which said Hillary had a 98 % chance of winning.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2017
    #34     Oct 5, 2017
    exGOPer likes this.
  5. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark



    I am not misrepresenting anything.You said Romney would win and Obama would be off multiple state ballots in 2012.Those predictions are far worse than my prediction being off by 78,000 votes in The EC and being right by millions in my prediction that more people would vote for Hillary.



    Obama was on every state ballot you dumb ass birther.Your dumb ass also thought Palin was going to be the 2012 GOP nominee.





    Te media didn't need to explain the surprise Romney victory since he lost by 5 million votes and 126 EC votes you fucking idiot
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2017
    #35     Oct 5, 2017
    exGOPer likes this.
  6. piezoe

    piezoe

    But wait just a fucking minute!, 'loser', 'low energy', 'tiny' jem.* Tony was magnanimous in quoting what proved to be a very accurate prediction of that asshole Trump having a two percent chance of winning. Any reasonable person would have said Trump's chance of winning was infinitesimal. But Tony gave him the benefit of a doubt. Two percent! That was way more than generous.

    I thought, myself, Trump had an infinitesimal chance of even getting the nomination, let alone winning the election, after he insulted everyone in the Republican party, and pretty much every adult in the United States except those Port-a-Potty dealers in Wisconsin.

    Trump squeaked by in the Electoral College by one of the closest margins of victory in U.S. History; consistent with a 2% chance of winning. Congratulations to Tony for being SPOT ON.!!!!!

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eople-in-three-states/?utm_term=.5a51ae8d523f
    ______________________
    * I'm quoting your buddy here. I have more respect for you than that!
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2017
    #36     Oct 5, 2017
    Tony Stark likes this.
  7. Ahhh no. Your ilk was predicting a major landslide and Trump was considered to be the best possible opponent because any idiot could allegedly beat him.

    You were about as far off as you could be. Interesting the way you botched the 2016 prediction -wherein a majory landslide turned out to be a complete loss- yet you are able to predict the 2020 election within three decimal points.

    Just keep counting those popular votes. Maybe get a couple hundred thousand more in California and Oregon and then just be surprised all over again that it is the electoral college votes that count. giggle.
     
    #37     Oct 5, 2017
  8. #38     Oct 5, 2017
  9. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark


    Am aware,I am also aware we only lost that by 78,000 votes.The 10% drop in Trumps approval rating covers that and more alone.But you guys keep thinking that 78,000 vote win will hold in 2020 when democrats will be out voting like they did in 2008.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2017
    #39     Oct 5, 2017
  10. #40     Oct 5, 2017