Why did you assume that? I was responding to your invitation for someone to play. In keeping with the spirit of the thread I attempted illustrate my actions in a minimalist fashion using the same chart you offered. If I wanted to try making a joke or disrupting your thread I wouldn't have showcased a single unimpressive B/E trade.
Here is my best attempt at interpreting the narrative via trader behavior. I can't quite differentiate events in as fine of segments as you numbered so I had to group some periods together in order to form my attempt at a response. **should read "slope" under 11 - 12
Dbphoenix, I would very much like to learn from you and I will do my best. But I’m still confused. I get the 1 2 3 swing – that is classic. I get the idea of drawing the UL. I don’t know how to determine when a market is overbought and so therefore the lines are not to be redrawn. I don’t know if your third chart is a UL copied to become the LL or vice versa. Maybe in this case it doesn’t matter because the fit seems so perfectly. I’m not sure what the point of the two pink line charts is. Then there are the two charts with the horizontal pink and green lines. I can see that these are flags and could be tradable as such, but how do they fit with your model? And then the next chart has a bunch of numbers which I don’t understand. Overall, I don't know how to use the ideas to generate trades. Can you notate some trade points with the logic behind them? Thanks!
If for some reason you want to learn this, and the pdf makes no sense to you, and the previous four journals don't do it for you either, you'll have to study the source material. If you don't want to read the entire course, I've made suggestions for reducing it to Wyckoff Lite.
In this example though, you're following the logic I'm accustomed to. My question was why you constructed an up-sloping trend channel based on a supply line instead of waiting for the ability to draw it with a demand line. (In terms of extremes, up-sloping would use low-high-low points, down-sloping high-low-high points.) Put more simply, I thought that the relevant slope angle was that of the side which is overpowering the other. Not 100% sure what you're looking for, and I'm still not even half-way in Wyckoff's 400 pages, but I'll give it a shot from my current model for fun, even though my slower perspective will be evident. No laughing! 1. Break out of resistance level. 2. We found some supply. 3. Price retraces to the median line with brief consensus. 4. Test of former resistance as support and of tentative demand line, enough to get me interested. 5. New demand found. 6. 7. Price reaches the median line and the current high again, meets the same supply as before 2. 8. Re-test of the demand line, interesting alternative entry for me. 9. Break through current high, new demand still present. 10. Some consensus found below the upper parallel. 11. New high found new supply, as in 2, and yields a strong reaction. (Note that my normal protective stops would likely be around 1962 and thus get me out here, but I'm trying to keep the above closer to how I interpret "purer" SLA, which would involve staying in through here until the demand line gets broken. Exiting at this break of the median line would be arbitrary to me here.) 12. Price finally breaks the demand line cleanly enough to exit. Here's an alternative (again roughly drawn in the GIMP, sorry about that, the median line is a bit too high) where I update the channel's slope based on the loose support found at 4 to better encompass the possible up-sloping range at that time (11:00-ish). Interesting how the above illustrates demand a bit better (4, 8, 12) but this slightly gentler channel happened to provide me with the "blue-to-blue" (supply-to-demand) limit exits I'm fond of (at either "10" or certainly "DT"). Again, I realize this isn't pure "draw a straight line", and certainly not narrating much behavior, especially knowing how you hate orders placed in advance, but that's my play since you encouraged participation. Looking forward to seeing yours! (And to look back at mine in a month or two...)