Funny how different a year can be. The article I had read was cited a few posts lower is from 2011. Your's is from 2010. The article from 2011 acknowledges that the chanel has hisotically been very profitable. Since you are living in January 2010, I'll give you a hint for your trading. Short Goldman now! I think it's around 160. You won't be sorry.
Which german?? <a href="http://s1219.photobucket.com/albums/dd438/bswansen1/?action=view&current=9obgcw9lzmribocr.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1219.photobucket.com/albums/dd438/bswansen1/9obgcw9lzmribocr.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a> <a href="http://s1219.photobucket.com/albums/dd438/bswansen1/?action=view&current=images.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1219.photobucket.com/albums/dd438/bswansen1/images.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>
I would be much stronger than "seems." Her incompetence on topics at hand is astounding. I actually mute Bloomberg now when she is live. Could care less what someone looks like while I'm working. Like most I only listen to it on background with occasional head turn for data streamer. She has CNBC written all over her cheap/interrupting delivery. Not that it will do much, I emailed Adam Johnson to notify him that this new addition needs much work and I will likely watch him less since they are tied together. Some of the anchor interactions with Regan are tepid, you can sense internally they are saying to themselves "what a ditz!"