Holy....that was...quite a press conference.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Tsing Tao, Feb 16, 2017.

  1. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    Propaganda.
     
    #231     Feb 22, 2017
  2. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    Absolutely no truth to that.

    Balahahaha. What an idiot!
     
    #232     Feb 22, 2017
  3. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    .....
     
    #233     Feb 22, 2017
  4. piezoe

    piezoe

    #234     Feb 22, 2017
  5. jem

    jem

    what joke you are zzzz... did you read the article did you see they were reporting on a washington post article...

    reading comprehension... try it.


    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...amas-biggest-whoppers/?utm_term=.50fa951ae4a0



    To keep it simple, we have shortened the quotes in the headlines. To read the full column, click on the link embedded in the quote.

    [​IMG]


    “More young black men languish in prison than attend colleges and universities across America”

    This was a 2007 campaign claim by Obama, then a senator, that was wildly off the mark. In reality, there are five times more black men enrolled in colleges and universities than young black men in federal and state prisons — and two and half times the total number incarcerated (including local jails). Even if you expanded the age group to include African American males up to 30 or 35, the college attendees would still outnumber the prisoners.

    “We signed into law the biggest middle-class tax cut in history”

    This 2011 claim was not based on a dollar figure but on dubious math — that supposedly 95 percent of working families received some kind of tax cut under the Making Work Pay provision in Obama’s stimulus bill. John F. Kennedy actually wins the prize for biggest tax cut, at least in the last half-century. By the same measure, the income tax provisions of George W. Bush tax cuts were more than twice as large as Obama’s tax cut over the same three-year time span. (While a large portion of Bush’s tax cut went to the wealthy, it also benefited the working poor.)

    “90 percent of the budget deficit is due to George W. Bush’s policies”

    During the 2012 campaign, Obama repeatedly reminded voters that he became president during a grim economic crisis. But he went too far when he claimed that only 10 percent of the federal deficit was due to his own policies. About half of the deficit stemmed from the recession and forecasting errors, but a large chunk (44 percent in 2011) were the result of Obama’s actions. At another point, Obama also falsely suggested that the Bush tax cuts led to the Great Recession.

    “If you like your health-care plan, you can keep it”

    This memorable promise by Obama backfired on him in 2013 when the Affordable Care Act went into effect and at least 2 million Americans started receiving cancellation notices. As we explained, part of the reason for so many cancellations is because of an unusually early (March 23, 2010) cutoff date for grandfathering plans — and because of tight regulations written by the administration. So the uproar could be pinned directly on the administration’s own actions.

    “The Capitol Hill janitors just got a pay cut”

    President Obama offered an evocative image at a 2013 news conference when the sequester spending cuts struck the federal budget — janitors sweeping the empty halls of the Capitol, laboring for less pay. But it turned out that he was completely wrong. Janitorial staff did not face a pay cut — and Capitol Hill administrative officials even issued a statement saying the president’s remarks were “not true.” Then the White House tried to argue that janitors at least faced a loss of overtime. That was not correct either. The episode was emblematic of the administration’s overheated rhetoric during the sequester debate.

    “The day after Benghazi happened, I acknowledged that this was an act of terrorism”

    Obama did refer to an “act of terror” in the immediate aftermath of the 2012 Benghazi attacks, but in vague terms, wrapped in a patriotic fervor. He never affirmatively stated that the American ambassador died because of an “act of terror.” Then, over a period of two weeks, given three opportunities in interviews to affirmatively agree that the Benghazi attack was a terrorist attack, the president obfuscated or ducked the question. So this was a case of taking revisionist history too far for political reasons.

    “I didn’t call the Islamic State a ‘JV’ team”

    In 2014, Obama repeated a claim, crafted by the White House communications team, that he was not “specifically” referring to the Islamic State terror group when he dismissed the militants who had taken over Fallujah as a “JV squad.” But The Fact Checker obtained the previously unreleased transcript of the president’s interview with the New Yorker, and it’s clear that’s who the president was referencing.

    “Republicans have filibustered 500 pieces of legislation”

    Obama, a former senator, got quite a few things wrong in this 2014 claim. He spoke of legislation that would help the middle class, but he was counting cloture votes that mostly involved judicial and executive branch nominations. Moreover, he counted all the way back to 2007, meaning he even included votes in which he, as senator, voted against ending debate — the very thing he decried in his remarks. At best, he could claim the Republicans had blocked about 50 bills, meaning he was off by a factor of 10.

    “The Keystone pipeline is for oil that bypasses the United States”

    Long before Obama killed the Keystone pipeline project in 2015, he made a number of dubious claims about it, including that the pipeline would have no benefit for American producers at all. But the crude oil would have traveled to the Gulf Coast, where it would be refined into products such as motor gasoline and diesel fuel; the State Department said odds were low that all would be exported. Also, about 12 percent of the pipeline’s capacity had been set aside for crude from North Dakota and Montana.

    “We have fired a whole bunch of people who are in charge of these [VA] facilities”

    Fact Checker newsletter

    What's true, what's false or in-between.

    Obama in 2016 misled the public about the number of people held accountable for the 2014 scandal over manipulated wait-time data at the Department of Veterans Affairs, which contributed to patient deaths. Congress responded by passing a law that sped up disciplinary actions for senior executive service employees. But when Obama made his statement in September, only one senior executive had been removed for a case involving wait time (though the actual firing was for an ethics violation).



















     
    #235     Feb 22, 2017
    Max E. and Tom B like this.
  6. jem

    jem

    thanks... but
    you seem to have a misunderstanding.
    I made no comment about whether the money had been frozen or was Irans or not.

    your argument is irrelevant and red herring.

    My point was that Obama lied about how when and why he gave them the money.
    I noted how hard your article tried to spin what really happened. But even yoru article could not explain why 400 million in foreign currency was delivered by plane to get around Congress. Probably a criminal act.

    If you looked into it further you can see the cash probably enabled them to buy uranium.


     
    #236     Feb 22, 2017
  7. jem

    jem

    http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...t-president-obama-broke-law-sending-cash-iran

    It is a waste of time to debate that point further. The Iranians have bragged that the astonishing cash payment was a ransom — and Obama has been telling us for months that we can trust the Iranians. The hostages were released the same day the cash arrived. One of the hostages has reported that the captives were detained an extra several hours at the airport and told they would not be allowed to leave until the arrival of another plane — inferentially, the unmarked cargo plane ferrying the cash. The reason American policy has always prohibited paying ransoms to terrorists and other abductors is that it only encourages them to take more hostages. And, as night follows day, Iran has abducted more Americans since Obama paid the cash. No matter how energetically the president tries to lawyer the ransom issue, if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck . . . –– ADVERTISEMENT –– More worth examining is why the transaction took the bizarre form that it did. To cut to the chase, I believe it was to camouflage — unsuccessfully — the commission of felony law violations. The Wall Street Journal has reported that the Justice Department strongly objected to the cash payment to Iran. As we shall see, that should come as no surprise. What is surprising is the Journal’s explanation of Justice’s concerns: Department officials, it is said, fretted that the transaction looked like a ransom payment. I don’t buy that. It is not a federal crime to pay a ransom; just to receive one. Our government’s stated disapproval of paying ransoms is a prudent policy, not a legal requirement. The Justice Department’s principal job is to enforce the laws, not to ensure good policy in foreign relations. It seems far more likely that Justice was worried that the transaction was illegal.

    Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...t-president-obama-broke-law-sending-cash-iran
     
    #237     Feb 22, 2017
  8. upload_2017-2-23_7-40-50.jpeg
     
    #238     Feb 23, 2017
    Tsing Tao likes this.
  9. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    That's the way he operates. Throws a bunch of random statements against the wall, hopes one sticks and people just accept it. Believes this strategy makes him appear smart.
     
    #239     Feb 23, 2017
  10. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    Full disclosure, I adapted that line from A Fish Called Wanda when Jamie Lee Curtis is scolding Kevin Kline ("Otto")...
     
    #240     Feb 23, 2017