I can back up that you are an Obama hater. That is for sure. Whether that hatred extends to all backs only you can answer.
So? So what? I can only assume you mean "blacks". Me despising all Obama stands for immediately makes me racist, is that it? The ol' liberal rallying cry. Let me ask you something. It's widely known on this forum that I voted for Obama the first time around (in 2008). Did I suddenly get racist in the last 4 years? Or could it be more that I was severely disappointed with the worthless President he turned out to be? Are you ever going to think before you post?
nukes and money to Iran... lie after lie benghazi lie after lie keep your doctor keep your health care rates will go down crazy lie after lie after lie. I found out about it in the press... was almost always a lie. he knew damn well about hillarys email. here are 10 big ones from the washington post... http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/01/19/washington-post-catalogues-the-biggest-lies-obama-ever-told/ here is something you might like... http://www.infowars.com/252-documen...as-lying-lawbreaking-corruption-cronyism-etc/ If Obama was not lying he was spinning. If there was any truth about what he had to say it was coincidence. nobody in history lied more about more things than obama save clinton.
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/01/19/washington-post-catalogues-the-biggest-lies-obama-ever-told/ The Washington Post marked the end of the Obama administration with a list Thursday that likely didn’t please the outgoing president’s supporters. For the last five years, the Post has made its political Fact Checker a staple of the publication. Ranked by “Pinocchios,” contenders receive one Pinocchio for a little lie and can earn up to four Pinocchios for the most outrageous of fibs. Though the Post ran its trademark Fact Checker during President Barack Obama’s first campaign, it wasn’t until 2011 that it became a fixture there, so admittedly the publication missed some blatant dishonesty. But the newspaper has fact-checked more than 250 statements made by the current president. On his last full day in office, the Post published a catalogue of Obama’s 10 biggest lies. Included on the list, unsurprisingly, was Obama’s statement to the American public while rallying for Congress to pass his signature health-care legislation, Obamacare: “If you like your health care plan, you can keep it.” googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display("div-gpt-ad-In-Content_300x250_102"); }); " style="box-sizing: border-box;"> “If you like your health-care plan, you can keep it” This memorable promise by Obama backfired on him in 2013 when the Affordable Care Act went into effect and at least 2 million Americans started receiving cancellation notices. As we explained, part of the reason for so many cancellations is because of an unusually early (March 23, 2010) cutoff date for grandfathering plans — and because of tight regulations written by the administration. So the uproar could be pinned directly on the administration’s own actions. Another whopper was Obama’s claim that all but 10 percent of the federal deficit was due to former President George W. Bush’s policies. Pushing back against criticisms of running up the deficit at an unparalleled rate with stimulus packages and bailouts, Obama made this claim during his 2012 campaign. “90 percent of the budget deficit is due to George W. Bush’s policies” During the 2012 campaign, Obama repeatedly reminded voters that he became president during a grim economic crisis. But he went too far when he claimed that only 10 percent of the federal deficit was due to his own policies. About half of the deficit stemmed from the recession and forecasting errors, but a large chunk (44 percent in 2011) were the result of Obama’s actions. At another point, Obama also falsely suggested that the Bush tax cuts led to the Great Recession. And throughout Obama’s two terms in office, he has been quick to dismiss clear acts of terrorism — using phrases like “workplace violence” or blaming a YouTube video for an attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya. The Post also included his categorization of the Benghazi attack as “an act of terror” and his reference to ISIS as a “JV team.” “The day after Benghazi happened, I acknowledged that this was an act of terrorism” Obama did refer to an “act of terror” in the immediate aftermath of the 2012 Benghazi attacks, but in vague terms, wrapped in a patriotic fervor. He never affirmatively stated that the American ambassador died because of an “act of terror.” Then, over a period of two weeks, given three opportunities in interviews to affirmatively agree that the Benghazi attack was a terrorist attack, the president obfuscated or ducked the question. So this was a case of taking revisionist history too far for political reasons. “I didn’t call the Islamic State a ‘JV’ team” In 2014, Obama repeated a claim, crafted by the White House communications team, that he was not “specifically” referring to the Islamic State terror group when he dismissed the militants who had taken over Fallujah as a “JV squad.” But The Fact Checker obtained the previously unreleased transcript of the president’s interview with the New Yorker, and it’s clear that’s who the president was referencing. But the Post did leave out some key falsehoods recited by Obama over the years. Here are a few: “Over the past eight years, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully executed an attack on our homeland that was directed from overseas.” Playing a semantics game, Obama misrepresented the fact that there have been many terrorist attacks carried out on American soil by those with ties to foreign terrorist organizations. In fact, in the case of the 2009 Fort Hood shooting in Killeen, Texas, Major Nidal Hasan murdered 14 people on the military base while shouting “allahu akbar” and was shown to be in direct contact with Al Qaeda terrorist leader Anwar al-Awlaki prior to the attack. ISIS themselves also claimed responsibility for a 2015 attack in Garland, Texas, when two men were taken down by police officers after they shot up a community center hosting a Muhammad cartoon contest. Over the last eight years, there were even more terrorist-related attacks in the country, including the San Bernardino attack, Boston Marathon attack, and a 2009 Little Rock, Arkansas, attack when Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad shot two soldiers at a military recruiting station. Muhammad also had ties to al-Qaeda. “Let me say this as plainly as I can: by Aug. 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end.” Obama claimed that combat operations would be finished by 2010 and later took credit for ending U.S. combat in Iraq. But his own former Defense Secretary Robert Gates disputed that in 2016, the White House did a “disservice” to troops by engaging in word games. “I think that it is incredibly unfortunate not to speak openly about what’s going on,” Gates told MSNBC. “American troops are in action, they are being killed, they are in combat. And these semantic backflips to avoid using the term combat is a disservice to those who are out there putting their lives on the line.” “We have not had a major scandal in my administration.”
Thank you. I am trying to find more current articles. I couldn't access the forbes article, they apparently want me to be a subscriber. The usnews was good, however as it was on, it seems third, quarter 2012 data, it was still a little early for what I am looking for. The NYPost Article on 3rd quarter 2011 data, at the latedt, was too early to be of much use. But thank you again.
I think there may be a misunderstanding here. A lot of people are claiming it was "pay off money". Implying it was "our money"; it wasn't. It was theirs all along. We had impounded it. But that doesn't make it ours. It was their money, and we agreed to return to them. That seemed perfectly ok to me. I saw it as a win-win deal, which is what negotiators strive for. Let's try to be somewhat realistic here. If someone has impounded your money and they want you to do something for them, how willing are you going to be to cooperate if the deal doesn't include returning your money. P.S.: I like Gates, He told the truth. WE need more of that in Government. That's why I also like Snowden. He told the truth. If I am going to send my money off to Washington, I want the truth about what my government is doing with it.
No, turning someone from a supporter to a hater suggest deeper rooted issues. Maybe you should have those dealt with before you shit all over Obama. And then turning around and voting for the biggest bigot and misogynist in town makes you look flat out like an idiot who does not have his thought process and values in control. By the way, are you ever posting anything trading related on EliteTrader or are you just here for the sake of arguing all day?
Here another fake news shit head. Claiming to post from the Washington post and then linking to nazi websites. At least the Russians do a great job disguising their methods. You brown haters here are just outright primitive, true simpletons, the same as your simpleton car and fridge assembly jobs. What a bunch of losers.omg.
Do you just type to put characters on the screen? What does any of this even mean? Just because I don't subscribe to your looney values doesn't mean I'm an idiot and didn't have my values in control. Piss off, and worry about your own country. Stop obsessing about a country you have nothing to do with and have no vote in. What business is it of yours what belief I follow or whether I post trading material? You're just upset you continue to get your ass kicked in every time you try to debate me. I voted for Trump because he was the lesser of two evils. End of story.