That is an absolute fabrication. Complete fucking lie. You can call me names or say whatever you want but that is a malicious unfounded attack. Proof it! Show once when I have done that. Just one fucking time!!!!!
Well, I agree. It is clear! Here is what's missing. There is no where in his report where it is stated directly that there were emails on her server that were marked "secret" or "top secret." The closest they came to that was this, which has to be read very carefully: seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. In other words, and apparently, those emails on Clinton's server were about aspects of matters that where classified as Top Secret, but the emails themselves were perhaps not classified as top secret. When a document is classified, for example "Top Secret", it is because it contains Top Secret information somewhere in its body. Once that top secret information or statement is redacted, the remainder of the document could be, in many cases. down classified to confidential or even unclassified. Therefore is is quite possible to have an unclassified communication about a matter with highly classified aspects. The other thing that caught my eye was the "intelligence community" business. What this means is that in the opinion of others, some of the communications on Clinton's server should have been classified. But this is opinion. Individuals, not the "intelligence community", classify documents, often it's the originator. Hillary may have been telling the "legal" truth all along. She is after all a lawyer, and her husband did famously fall back on the meaning of "is". If there were emails on that server marked Secret or Top Secret, why didn't Comey just say so directly? Why beat around the bush? Why the circumspect language "concerning matters"?? I think we can begin to understand why Comey said there is nothing that can be successfully prosecuted here.
She has a history of embellishment. Such as the running for cover upon landing story. So it wouldn't be unprecedented for her to mis-remember. She may have lied!
You do it all the time. Each time you link to a source of content you foundationally disagree with you falsify the content and past erroneous content in your post that is not reflected in the link you pasted. I am not sure which is better Russian hacking or what you are doing.
This is what I call a pretty unbiased viewpoint. Fair reflection of reality. What the right wing extremists here stare is that she lied where it is unproven she lied. But in the same sentence they claimed Trump fired Flynn because he "mistalked or misrepresented to Pence". No, he maliciously lied to Pence else Trump would have never fired him
Ok. sure. The so called main stream media is informed by leaked information by the intelligence community. In this respect they are no different from a state controlled media. The main stream media (NYT, WP, LAT, etc) are in collusion with the intelligence community.