"... the inventor of continuous fermentation" ? " http://www.dbexportbeer.co.nz/History/Morton-his-Inventions The birth of Continuous Fermentation. When Morton took over the family brewery, he used the same ingenuity and lateral thinking heâd applied to his inventions. And it wasnât long before the spanners were out again. It was here that Morton created the world famous âContinuous Fermentationâ, a groundbreaking brewing process where raw materials are added to one end of the system and beer is continuously withdrawn from the other â effectively a beer tap that never turns off! " " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morton_W._Coutts Continuous fermentation method In the 1930s, Coutts investigated the nature of yeast which is the most important ingredient in any brewing. Coutts speculated: ...that yeast could be properly controlled if you looked on it as a human being with a brain. It has so many enzyme mechanisms to call upon to react to whatever is necessary for its survival. Instead of looking on the final product I always took notice of the yeast as an organism that produced whatever you ended up with. This led him to create the wort stabilisation process, which resulted in a clearer and consistent wort. He then separated the fermentation into stages. In the first stage the yeast grew and in the second the fermentation began. The yeast was thus encouraged to either grow or produce alcohol. As a result Coutts created a continuous flow between the two fermentation processes. "
Thank you for your report on the problem of achieving continuous fermentation. Maybe the research is explaining how two different processes are linked. When they are merged into a single process, then the inovation centers on keeping the yeast growing while simultaneously extracting the product (alcohol). Some key words for your next search may be surfactant and osmosis.
WTS is the first one that comes to mind. I have a friend there making a killing utilizing routing and dark pool access with large block trades for pennies. There are multiple others, each with its own "teachable" edge. Traders really have a choice to listen to these unverifiable, TA gurus with past tales of granduer and go down that road, or join a prop firm to learn how its really done today. surf
Here are the "teachable" elements: 1. routing, 2. dark pool access, and 3. large block trades for pennies. Thank God there are no down side expenses to wipe out those pennies or no other better use for that capital. I'm a verifiable TA trader. Here is my suggestion for proving TA systems work while you make money. 1. Link in to a TA system based MAT operation. 2. Watch (look at it during rth) your linked in account grow as the MAT uses the TA system (be on skype with the operator of the TA system). 3. Add or withdraw funds as required.
Teachable only within the infrastructure and relationships of the prop firm itself. YOU CAN NOT do this on your own. The edge is unavailable to you. This is why the mental masterbation of technical analysis is so weak. These guys will clean your clock because their tech is better then yours. For these folks who say success only comes from years of self teaching. I say total BS. NOOBS, join a good prop firm and learn how to trade. Stop listening to no name Price Action claimed savants who really have no edge. surf PS-- maybe some folks can develop the tech and relationships on their own, I should never say never-- but its way too costly when it can be accessed via simply joining a firm.
Sorry, this was a funny joke I made on my facebook wall July 27th: <I> There are fewer Commodity Trading Advisors (CTA's) in Kentucky than there are Neurosurgeons. I'm 1 of 7 and 1 of the other 7 is in Danville, too! So more than a quarter of the CTA'S in Kentucky live in Danville. </I> You all should try to be neurosurgeons in Kentucky. I'm sure then you'll really get to know some mental head cases. That combine is useless if it doesn't recognize valid statements from a broker, which is more than enough for me to completely ignore marketsurfer for an indeterminable amount of time.
While I was at PFG they had an iPhone cloud server app called iBroker, and with it every trade I'd make would automatically be tweeted to my feed in a standard recognizable format. (There were many in my symbols not using autotweet and just announcing after the fact stuff the same as is on here). Paying twitter thousands to get a large following didn't seem worth it, but every time I'd see those trades go off making thousands there wasn't much difference to me between tweeting the trades and letting them get marked on a blotter that you can still pay to view. In the end this did compete with my trading company's exclusive right to publish my results so I stopped doing that but anyone at OpenE-cry can do this if they're so inclined. About the only pleasurable feedback I got from doing that was one experienced trader noticing that my methods were, to use his description, "quite lethal." And they still are.
And others yelling via insinuation at the other to "put up or shut up", all the time... I'm just sick of it, too! Got any strawberry left over for the rest of us?