History Channel documentary debunks all 9/11 conspiracy theories, 1 by 1

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Hello, Sep 12, 2010.

  1. 377OHMS

    377OHMS

    As I said, the science kind of ends right there.

    I don't see where they changed a single original structural element of the building to accomodate various agencies. All the added stuff is just bling on top of the orignal load bearing steel members. No amount of cassons or lashing changes the fact that there was hundreds of tons of building above the fire area and somewhat compromised design due to the power substation. It wasn't going to take much to bring that building down and the failure of one corner caused a collapse laterally across the structure.

    It ain't rocket surgery.
     
    #201     Sep 17, 2010
  2. So the DOJ, FEMA, CIA, etc, etc ,etc government agencies AND the Mayors command center were just kind of allowed to be taken out by fires...............LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    So all these wondrous govt agencies with all their critical offices were not out making DAMN SURE that fires in THEIR HOME TURF building were getting handled!!!

    So lets see on 9/11 what all happened from the "box cutter" boys.................

    NORAD --> FAILED

    FAA --> FAILED

    CIA --> FAILED

    FEMA --> FAILED

    FBI --> FAILED

    US AIR FORCE --> FAILED

    THE ADMINISTRATION --> FAILED


    .....but again......so ALL those govt agencies in WTC 7 could not make DAMN SURE their building (which was NEVER hit by any aircraft) stayed managed from a fire fighting stand point....you mean all those govt agencies did not have the PULL to make DAMN SURE their bldg was saved from office fires?????????????????????? :eek:
     
    #202     Sep 17, 2010
  3. <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qxOwHutnXNA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qxOwHutnXNA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
     
    #203     Sep 17, 2010
  4. 377OHMS

    377OHMS

    Well I've convinced myself you aren't interested in the technical merits but rather seem more interested in the vast conspiracy that is just below the surface of it all.

    Maybe its just good entertainment or something. If I actually believed a fraction of the stuff you are saying I would leave the country awfully fast. Why would you live under the governance of the people you suspect did this if you really believed?
     
    #204     Sep 17, 2010
  5. 377OHMS

    377OHMS

    lol ok I think we're all done here, enjoy your hobby. :D
     
    #206     Sep 17, 2010
  6. That's about it... :p
     
    #207     Sep 17, 2010
  7. Structural System

    Building 7 was a 100% steel frame building. Like most modern skyscrapers, it had a series of columns ringing its perimeter, and a bundle of columns in its core structure. Its perimeter columns numbered 58 and its core columns numbered 25

    For the core, the loads were transferred through a heavily braced foundation slab. 50 new foundation "caissons" were built, most of which had to be squeezed through the substation building.
     
    #208     Sep 17, 2010
  8. #209     Sep 17, 2010
  9. Hello

    Hello

    :p

    <object style="height: 344px; width: 425px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1ytCEuuW2_A?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1ytCEuuW2_A?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></object>
     
    #210     Sep 17, 2010