History Channel documentary debunks all 9/11 conspiracy theories, 1 by 1

AMT4SWA · Sep 16, 2010

Oh....let's not forget about Brzezinski!!!

This was obama's VERY FIRST "handler" going back to the very secretive Columbia U days (where are all the college transcripts or student aid records???)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V-bxx7OyZ0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbz9sVw4QsM&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKzEpQc-yo8

What does barry s. think about his wondrous HANDLER........ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASlETEx0T-I&feature=related

AMT4SWA · Sep 16, 2010

BTW.....while barry s. was getting HANDLED by Brzezinski during the Columbia years (where are his school transcripts and student aid records???) did barry actually ever go to school???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWSwMj7xk50

:eek: :eek: :eek:

AMT4SWA · Sep 16, 2010

So who is this barry s who was HANDLED by the AL Qaeda master himself Brzezinski???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84aKGyBvOsY&feature=fvsr

....and what kind of activities did barry s get exposed to through his family while growing up (prior to bumping into the master HANDLER Brzezinski)???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okKud3SHUjY

Well it all leads to one thing.................. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw

AMT4SWA · Sep 16, 2010

......and then to the CONTINUATION of an ongoing incremental OP AGAINST the United States of America!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Klqv9t1zVww&feature=channel

The TRUE ENEMY is not the CREATED Al Qaeda........it is much more powerful!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5E&feature=channel

AMT4SWA · Sep 16, 2010

NEVER FORGET THEIR GAME!!!

"how fortunate for governments that the people they administer dont think" - Adolf Hitler

phenomena · Sep 16, 2010

I really appreciate the effort. However, I'd really appreciate if you could answer in a paragraph or two. I didn't want to wade through 3 pagest of copied text. In a very simple answer, if al queda/wahabists/muslim extremists didn't do it, who did? I'm not saying those extremists aren't manupulative politicians like the rest.

Who did it, and why are the wahabist and alqueda taking the blame, if they didn't do it?

Quote from AMT4SWA:

Very simple......go to the core!!!

WHO REALLY IS Al-Qaeda??? Where did they come from and who are their "handlers"?

Next ask....WHO is Zbigniew Brzezinski and who is he aligned with GLOBALLY?

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

*** Introduction ***

One of the main objectives of war propaganda is to "fabricate an enemy". The "outside enemy" personified by Osama bin Laden is "threatening America".

Pre-emptive war directed against "Islamic terrorists" is required to defend the Homeland. Realities are turned upside down. America is under attack.

In the wake of 9/11, the creation of this "outside enemy" has served to obfuscate the real economic and strategic objectives behind the war in the Middle East and Central Asia. Waged on the grounds of self-defense, the pre-emptive war is upheld as a "just war" with a humanitarian mandate.

As anti-war sentiment grows and the political legitimacy the Bush Administration falters, doubts regarding the existence of this illusive "outside enemy" must be dispelled.

Counter-terrorism and war propaganda are intertwined. The propaganda apparatus feeds disinformation into the news chain. The terror warnings must appear to be "genuine". The objective is to present the terror groups as "enemies of America."

Ironically, Al Qaeda --the "outside enemy of America" as well as the alleged architect of the 9/11 attacks-- is a creation of the CIA.

From the outset of the Soviet-Afghan war in the early 1980s, the US intelligence apparatus has supported the formation of the "Islamic brigades". Propaganda purports to erase the history of Al Qaeda, drown the truth and "kill the evidence" on how this "outside enemy" was fabricated and transformed into "Enemy Number One".

The US intelligence apparatus has created it own terrorist organizations. And at the same time, it creates its own terrorist warnings concerning the terrorist organizations which it has itself created. Meanwhile, a cohesive multibillion dollar counterterrorism program "to go after" these terrorist organizations has been put in place.

Portrayed in stylized fashion by the Western media, Osama bin Laden, supported by his various henchmen, constitutes Americaâs post-Cold war bogeyman, who "threatens Western democracy". The alleged threat of "Islamic terrorists", permeates the entire US national security doctrine. Its purpose is to justify wars of aggression in the Middle East, while establishing within America, the contours of the Homeland Security State.

Historical Background

What are the historical origins of Al Qaeda? Who is Osama bin Laden?

The alleged mastermind behind the 9/11 terrorists attacks, Saudi-born Osama bin Laden, was recruited during the Soviet-Afghan war, "ironically under the auspices of the CIA, to fight Soviet invaders".(Hugh Davies, "`Informersâ point the finger at bin Laden; Washington on alert for suicide bombers." The Daily Telegraph, London, 24 August 1998).

In 1979 the largest covert operation in the history of the CIA was launched in Afghanistan:

"With the active encouragement of the CIA and Pakistanâs ISI, who wanted to turn the Afghan Jihad into a global war waged by all Muslim states against the Soviet Union, some 35,000 Muslim radicals from 40 Islamic countries joined Afghanistanâs fight between 1982 and 1992. Tens of thousands more came to study in Pakistani madrasahs. Eventually, more than 100,000 foreign Muslim radicals were directly influenced by the Afghan jihad." (Ahmed Rashid, "The Taliban: Exporting Extremism", Foreign Affairs, November-December 1999).

This project of the US intelligence apparatus was conducted with the active support of Pakistanâs Inter Services Intelligence (ISI), which was entrusted in channelling covert military aid to the Islamic brigades and financing, in liason with the CIA, the madrassahs and Mujahideen training camps.

U.S. government support to the Mujahideen was presented to world public opinion as a "necessary response" to the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in support of the pro-Communist government of Babrak Kamal.

The CIAâs military-intelligence operation in Afghanistan, which consisted in creating the "Islamic brigades", was launched prior rather than in response to the entry of Soviet troops into Afghanistan. In fact, Washingtonâs intent was to deliberately trigger a civil war, which has lasted for more than 25 years.

The CIAâs role in laying the foundations of Al Qaeda is confirmed in an 1998 interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, who at the time was National Security Adviser to President Jimmy Carter:

Brzezinski: According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahideen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, [on] 24 December 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise. Indeed, it was July 3, 1979, that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the President in which I explained to him that in my opinion, this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.

Question: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?

Brzezinski: It isnât quite that. We didnât push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.

Question: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didnât believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You donât regret anything today?

Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam War. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.

Question: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?

Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War? ( "The CIAâs Intervention in Afghanistan, Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carterâs National Security Adviser", Le Nouvel Observateur, Paris, 15-21 January 1998, published in English, Centre for Research on Globalisation, http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html 5 October 2001, italics added.)

Consistent with Brzezinskiâs account, a "Militant Islamic Network" was created by the CIA.

The "Islamic Jihad" (or holy war against the Soviets) became an integral part of the CIAâs intelligence ploy. It was supported by the United States and Saudi Arabia, with a significant part of the funding generated from the Golden Crescent drug trade:

"In March 1985, President Reagan signed National Security Decision Directive 166 â¦ [which] authorize[d] stepped-up covert military aid to the Mujahideen, and it made clear that the secret Afghan war had a new goal: to defeat Soviet troops in Afghanistan through covert action and encourage a Soviet withdrawal. The new covert U.S. assistance began with a dramatic increase in arms supplies â a steady rise to 65,000 tons annually by 1987 â¦ as well as a "ceaseless stream" of CIA and Pentagon specialists who travelled to the secret headquarters of Pakistanâs ISI on the main road near Rawalpindi, Pakistan. There, the CIA specialists met with Pakistani intelligence officers to help plan operations for the Afghan rebels."(Steve Coll, The Washington Post, July 19, 1992.)

The Central Intelligence Agency using Pakistanâs ISI as a go-between played a key role in training the Mujahideen. In turn, the CIA-sponsored guerrilla training was integrated with the teachings of Islam. The madrasahs were set up by Wahabi fundamentalists financed out of Saudi Arabia: "t was the government of the United States who supported Pakistani dictator General Zia-ul Haq in creating thousands of religious schools, from which the germs of the Taliban emerged."(Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA), "RAWA Statement on the Terrorist Attacks in the U.S.", Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG),
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/RAW109A.html , 16 September 2001)

Predominant themes were that Islam was a complete socio-political ideology, that holy Islam was being violated by the atheistic Soviet troops, and that the Islamic people of Afghanistan should reassert their independence by overthrowing the leftist Afghan regime propped up by Moscow. (Dilip Hiro, Fallout from the Afghan Jihad, Inter Press Services, 21 November 1995.)
More...

Trader666 · Sep 16, 2010

You're an idiot. If this story had any credibility the factors you mentioned could no better contain it and keep it from becoming a 24/7 national obsession, than a paper bag could contain a nuclear explosion.

Quote from denner:

"lame, ulterior motives" like perhaps the fact that we run a war economy and that completely dissecting the "story" would essentially further tear apart the fabric of this country.

Not to mention that the conglomerates that own the media are basically a de-facto part of the government. Go ahead and find a few non mainstream media outlets and I'll show you years worth of research and due diligence towards discrediting the official story.

Who owns NBC, ABC, etc, etc? Further, how many of the guys running the show are of a particular religion that would support an invasion of the Middle East?

Now go shove up your asshole.
More...

Trader666 · Sep 16, 2010

Nonsense. You contradict yourself because you and the other kooks keep pointing to people and "proof" that the media has PLENTY OF ACCESS to. But the media rightly dismisses it because it's conspiratorial lunacy.

Quote from AMT4SWA:

TOTALLY FALSE.....it is all about ACCESS!

If they play "the game" like good little boys and girls they get access....if they don't they are out in the ditch with ZERO traction to ANY significant CONTROLLED news. Corporate media PLAYS THE GAME to get THE ACCESS.....they do not give a damn what the story is (real or false). Corporate media have been manipulated in nothing more then HOGS......when the "handlers" pour the slop in the trough they all come running! They all eat the same slop from the same trough......the only fight was for the ACCESS.....who got to the SLOP FIRST! :eek:
More...

AMT4SWA · Sep 16, 2010

Quote from Trader666:

Nonsense. You contradict yourself because you and the other kooks keep pointing to people and "proof" that the media has PLENTY OF ACCESS to. But the media rightly dismisses it because it's conspiratorial lunacy.
More...

You do not understand the fundamentals of how the corporate media game is played. The "controlled" corporate media already knows what they CAN or what they CAN'T report......and the gladly go along with the "canned" story to remain at the trough eating the slop. In addition, many corporate media entities themselves DO NOT want the reality to be known......they have a "directed" agenda as their part in the grand SHOW!

You are being CONNED into a false reality by the so called INDEPENDENT media you try to defend......THEY laugh at you! :eek: The corporate media is a GRAND SHOW of false realities and they LOVE the SHOW.....they frequently have no considerations of the real truth! Here is just one simple example of the CON...........

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

in News Corp. â the parent company of Fox News â has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to causes linked to the imam planning to build a Muslim community center and mosque near Ground Zero in Manhattan, says a report from Yahoo!News.

According to the report from Yahoo!âs John Cook, Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, who owns seven percent of News Corp., âhas directly funded [Imam Feisal Abdul] Raufâs projects to the tune of more than $300,000.â

Cook reports that Prince Al-Waleedâs personal charity, the Kingdom Foundation, donated $305,000 to Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow, a project sponsored by two of Raufâs initiatives, the American Society for Muslim Advancement and the Cordoba Initiative, which is building the Manhattan mosque.

That Fox Newsâ second-largest shareholder, after Rupert Murdoch, has financial links to the âGround Zero mosqueâ will be seen as ironic by critics of the news network, who have watched with chagrin as the networkâs talking heads attempt to link the mosque to radical Islamism.

Last week, Daily Show host Jon Stewart lambasted Fox panelist Eric Bollingâs attempt to link the Cordoba Initiative to Hamas and Iran. Stewart used News Corp.âs connections to Prince Al-Waleed, and the princeâs connections to the Carlyle Group and Osama bin Laden to make a tongue-in-cheek argument that Fox News may be a âterrorist command center.â

Stewart didnât need to take all those steps to make the connection,â Cook writes.

Cook also reports that Prince Al-Waleed has in the past funded a number of Islamic organizations that have been maligned by Fox News commentators:

Al-Waleed donated $500,000 to the Council on American-Islamic Relations â which has been repeatedly denounced on Fox Newsâs air by Geller and others as a terror group â in 2002. Indeed, Raufâs ânumerous ties to CAIRâ alone have been cited by the mosqueâs opponents as a justification for imputing terrorist sympathies to him, yet few people seem to be asking whether Murdochâs extensive multi-billion business collaboration with the man who funds both Rauf and CAIR merits investigation or concern.

Other beneficiaries of Al-Waleedâs largess include the Islamic Development Bank, a project designed to âfoster the economic development and social progress of [Muslims] in accordance with the principles of Shariâah.â The IDB funds the construction of mosques around the world, and has been implicated by frequent Fox News guest Stephen Schwartz in an attempt to spread radical Wahhabism (a fundamentalist branch of Islam) throughout the United States.

Cook notes that it was none other than News Corp.âs New York Post that reported on Prince Al-Waleedâs donation to Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow. He reports that Fox News had no comment for his article, and emails to the princeâs Kingdom Foundation were not returned.

Prince Al-Waleed owns an estimated $2.5-billion-worth of News Corp. Majority shareholder Rupert Murdoch recently took a stake in the princeâs Middle East-based media conglomerate, Rotana Group. Murdoch and Prince Al-Waleed are reportedly working on launching an Arabic news network that will compete with existing pan-Arabic networks Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya.

LEARN who OWNS the mainstream media and then you have a chance at landing into reality!

AMT4SWA · Sep 16, 2010

Now........

"Back to reality, Oh there goes gravity............"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNK1V6S2cbo

:eek: OOOOPS.....we read the CANNED script to early!!!!!! :eek: