Her best chance is to convince superdelegates that Obama will lead them to a certain loss. Hard to do when she is polling worse than he is against McCain, but there is a lot of time on the clock. Bill Richardson must be very sure Obama will be the nominee. I'd hate to be in his shoes if Hillary becomes President.
I thought it was a weird conflict when Richardson announced. Like many I figured he was posturing for veep on a Hill ticket. He campaigned hard against her though. In December he said, " âSheâs flip-flopped so many times, I donât know what her position is. It changes almost every day.â http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/22/richardson-clinton-has-flip-flopped-on-iraq/ Seems the rift has been there a while.....
I was curious why his endorsement is SO important??? Most people never heard of the guy.... Dems might just go with Obama knowing he is going to lose badly....then they can go out and say they tried with the Blacks but they couldn't win....go with a white guy in 4 years...McCain is a one termer, I think....age will get him... Who knows..... SteveD
Don't count Hillary out. The Clintons still have the FBI file/private investigator strategy. Many of these super-delegates will have skeletons in their closets. They may claim publicly now that they will vote as the Democrat populous voted in their states, but when it comes to having their dirty laundry hung out for everyone to see there could be a big surprise for Obama at the convention.
Hillary's only chance is if she wins the support of John Edwards. That is quite doable, especially if she gives him the position of VP. However, Hillary might have a better chance if she goes for an independent run of the White House. A lot of independents are really afraid of Obama now, but are tired of the war as supported by McCain.
hillbillary will never give up and will destroy the democratic party before she concedes this election..........but obama will eventually get the nom......cause if he doesn't blacks will revolt.........hillbillary and obama are toast vs. mccain...........but all 3 are scumbags of the worst kind <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sVeFVtcdSYY&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sVeFVtcdSYY&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object> <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/F054Slq07wg&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/F054Slq07wg&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object> <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xBiti-ZbeO0&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xBiti-ZbeO0&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object> <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vFM1xqqTX_g&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vFM1xqqTX_g&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EGsUZFUPcJo&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EGsUZFUPcJo&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
nah.. that set up by whitehouse.com was shady. not saying that LS is telling the truth, but that whole effort was a joke. they said they were going to post the results from the second expert and post video and the next day everything was removed from the site and the check to sinclair bounced. that axelrod guy's name kept popping up... some sorta foul play going on there. i have a feeling this isnt over.... but again... i am not saying sinclair is legit.. just that whitehouse.com was very shady. it had been a porn site up until a month previous to that.