GOP Congressman Already Floating Impeachment For Hillary Clinton She hasn't even secured the Democratic nomination. WASHINGTON -- Hillary Clinton isn't president yet. She hasn't even won the Democratic nomination. But a Republican congressman is already getting ready for the opportunity to impeach her -- on the first day of her hypothetical presidency. Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) recently spoke with talk radio host Matt Murphy and said the real issue with Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of state is "how many lives she put at risk by violating all rules of law that are designed to protect America's top-secret and classified information from falling into the hands of our geopolitical foes who then might use that information to result in the deaths of Americans." Brooks added Republicans are going to make sure this issue follows Clinton into office, should she be elected president in 2016. "And in my judgement, with respect to Hillary Clinton, she will be a unique president if she is elected by the public next November, because the day she's sworn in is the day that she's subject to impeachment because she has committed high crimes and misdemeanors," he said. Brooks' office did not return a request for future details about the impeachment plan. Clinton is scheduled to testify Thursday before the House Select Committee on Benghazi. The committee has taken a beating in recent days after a couple of self-inflicted wounds from its own members questioning the nonpartisan nature of the panel. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) applauded the taxpayer-funded committee for helping damage Clinton's presidential prospects -- and then spent the following week trying to backtrack. Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.) said "a big part" of the Benghazi investigation was designed to go after Clinton rather than get to the bottom of the attacks. And a former Republican staffer on the committee also said his bosses were singularly focused on going after the former secretary of state.
OH NO, looks like Hillary is in deep doo-doo. Now we'll see which story is more important. Was Ben a thug teen, or did Hillary break the law? Inquiring minds want to know. Let the wagon circle begin. http://www.allenbwest.com/2015/11/developing-smoking-gun-revealed-in-hillary-clinton-email-scandal/ After months of listening to Hillary Clinton plead ignorance as part of her defense for mishandling her emails as Secretary of State, what appears to be a smoking gun has just emerged. The former Secretary of State herself signed a non-disclosure agreement acknowledging her responsibility to ascertain whether information shared by her was, in fact, classified. Moreover, the document Clinton signed clearly lays out stiff criminal penalties for “any unauthorized disclosure” of classified information.
Will politico be all over this? === Hillary signed State Department contract saying it was HER job to know if documents were classified top secret, and laid out criminal penalties for ´negligent handling´ Daily Mail (UK), by David MartoskoOriginal Article Posted By: JoniTx- 11/6/2015 2:46:33 PM Post Reply Hillary Clinton´s claim that she was unaware top secret documents on her private email server were highly classified took a hit on Friday, with the revelation of a State Department contract she signed in 2009. The ´Sensitive Compartmented Information Nondisclosure Agreement,´ which Clinton inked during her second day as Secretary of State, declared that she was personally responsible for determining if sensitive documents in her possession were classified at the government´s highest level. ´I understand that it is my responsibility to consult with appropriate management authorities in the Department … in order to ensure that I know whether information or
Well, politico got right on it, alright. Right after this report came out about Hillary signing this doc, which includes criminal penalties, wouldn't ya know that intel sources are Now Saying that there weren't any classified docs in Hillary's email after all. --------- Key Clinton emails did not contain highly classified secrets, inquiry finds Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...ail-no-highly-classified-215599#ixzz3qkkv2gXg It's just like the 90's all over again. When they get caught in the act, ya gotta get someone to change their story. This is like after she said she made her own cattle futures trades, and then it turned out they were illegal, she suddenly remembered that she didn't make them after all. Someone else did. And she'll get away with it this time, too. Watch and see.
She isn't off the hook yet. They said, "After a review, intelligence agencies concluded that the two emails did not include highly classified intelligence secrets, the source said. Well that doesn't tell the whole story. There are multiple layers to classified documents and they are, Official, Restricted, Confidential, Secret and Top Secret. The non-disclosure agreement she signed covers all of these, not just Top Secret. We'll see the hair splitting get really fine tuned, but the fact remains, if there is just one e-mail containing information included in even the lowest level of classified documents, she broke the law, even if it was through simple negligence. The law makes no provision for negligence. Intentionally or negligent, guilty is guilty. We'll see if the law applies to a Clinton.
now that harkens back to law school and crim law, strict liability, mens rea and scienter... fun times... seriously. I loved that stuff.
The chance of a perp walk has gone up at least a couple of percent -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The FBI’s Clinton Email Probe Just Took A New Turn CHUCK ROSS Reporter10:57 AM 11/10/2015 The FBI has expanded its probe into Hillary Clinton’s personal email system to what one analyst is calling a “full-blown investigation,” Politico is reporting. The FBI has interviewed a former State Department official about how Clinton aides communicated over email. And last month, the agency requested records from a data broker Clinton hired to find companies to manage her private email system after she left office in early 2013. While the FBI’s handling of the case has so far been characterized as a “preliminary inquiry,” the depth of the probe indicates it has reached a new phase. “This sounds to me like it’s more than a preliminary inquiry; it sounds like a full-blown investigation,” Tom Fuentes, a former assistant director of the FBI, told Politico. “When you have this amount of resources going into it…I think it’s at the investigative level.” http://google.com/gwt/x?wsc=ol&sour...st-took-a-new-turn/&ei=K2tCVuTnIsfGtQXn6YKQDw