I am still waiting for a link to the supposed video. All I saw posted was a heavily edited political advertisement with all kinds of snippets taken out of context.. It is really rather silly. Could people who were either Hillary or Bernie Supporters be involved in scuffles at Trump rallies. Of course. In the immortal words of Dick Cheney, "So". This political ad is reminiscent of the Creature of Jekyll island video. Same technique.
I am. I mean I am? Look, it probably got her off of the street. Now's she gonna get all this attention and money and start writing for Breitbart.
I don't know, we have a lot of homeless people. This would be a real playground for Hillary to come in and attack some of these deplorables.
The video - one of three - can be found here: Very early in you will hear how they were, in fact, coordinating directly with the HRC campaign.
I am not going to look at the video right now. Perhaps later, but I can tell you that since high tech video editing I don't trust videos, unless they come form a known reliable source and the origin and chain of handling is traceable. And even then I may not trust them. In particular I am going to question anything that does not make sense to me based on what I already know from reliable sources. Thank you, nevertheless.
GOP think tank: Trump's plans would just run up debt by Heather Long @byHeatherLong October 19, 2016: 5:28 PM ET The size of America's debt currently tops $19 trillion. "Our country has tremendous problems. We're a debtor nation. We're a serious debtor nation," Donald Trump said in the first debate. "But if Trump becomes president, America's debt is expected to skyrocket even further. "His tax and spending plans would add nearly $6.8 trillion to the U.S. debt over the next decade, according to a new analysis by the American Action Forum, a right-leaning think tank, which shared the report first with CNNMoney. "Donald Trump's policy proposals as a candidate for president would have a deleterious effect on the federal budget," says Gordon Gray, director of fiscal policy at the American Action Forum and a former staffer for Republican Senator Rob Portman. "Hillary Clinton would also add to the debt, but not by nearly as much. The think tank calculates her plans would pack an additional $1.5 trillion to the U.S. debt over the next decade. Related: Is anyone worried about America's $19 trillion debt? "So why is Trump adding so much more to the debt? Three words: Big tax cuts. He wants to slash taxes for both business and individuals. That leads to a substantial reduction in revenue coming into government coffers. "While Trump has proposed some spending decreases, it's not nearly large enough to offset the dramatically diminished amount of money coming in via taxes, the American Action Forum finds. "Trump has dubbed himself the "king of debt." He has used debt a lot to finance his business and real estate deals over the years. While Trump has promised he will reduce the national debt (or, at least, be "fiscally responsible") if he becomes president, numerous independent groups say that's not going to happen. "The American Action Forum is the latest to find that Trump will add a lot to the country's debt. Here are two other widely cited, non-partisan estimates: Related: Investors really want Clinton to win now 1. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget projects: Trump will add $5.3 trillion to the debt in the next decade. Clinton will add $200 billion to the debt in the next decade. 2. The Tax Policy Center projects: Trump's tax plan alone will add at least $7 trillion in the next decade. Clinton's tax plan alone will reduce the debt by $1.5 trillion in the next decade. Related: I'm casting a 'protest vote' in 2016 "The Trump campaign argues that large tax cuts and scaling back regulations would spur growth -- and thus bring in far more in tax revenues than the models project. "But Doug Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum and economic adviser to John McCain's 2008 presidential bid, says, "There aren't going to be growth effects big enough to offset these policies."
The economy or wall Street? They are completely disconnected. Wall Street will do well under a Clinton administration. The economy will continue to stay in the tank.