@ Piezoe - the video in question is widely available on the internet. The Washington Times discussed the fallout from the video in this article: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/18/undercover-video-shows-democrats-saying-they-hire-/ Did HRC authorize or have knowledge of this? Who knows. But like Nixon in Watergate, she is ultimately responsible for the actions of her staffers. I think, more to the point, is the systematic abrogation of what any reasonable person would consider appropriate behavior from a Presidential candidate. The actions of Wasserman-Schultz and, later, Donna Brazile; the lies to the FBI regarding the emails; the "sale" of State department influence for donations to the Clinton Foundation, and so on, are symptomatic of a level of corruption not seen in the White House for many years.
That's such an insightful and intelligent post, you've definitely raised the level of discourse and made people think, you should be so proud!
Thank you. A picture is worth a thousand words. And, it is common knowledge that liberals need pictures for comprehension.
Intelligent people can read the shit you post and know you are an uneducated, ignorant man with highly bigoted views you are quite proud of. It is what it is, self awareness obviously isn't your strong suit.
You continue to demonstrate that you are an imbecile. What are my bigoted views? BTW, how is your lawsuit against ET progressing?
Where do you get your news? The controversial evidence was revealed in undercover video not emails lol. Unbelievable that you can speak so vehemently about something and not have even the basic facts down.