Hillary Clinton win = what for the economy?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by marcoPolo21, Oct 19, 2016.

  1. harami

    harami

     
    #161     Oct 21, 2016
    Tom B likes this.
  2. drcha

    drcha

    So thanks for the laugh: the "I'm all for feminism" statement and then the diatribe about the proper place and demeanor of women. I just have to ask you, are you Donald Trump??
     
    #162     Oct 21, 2016
  3. zdreg

    zdreg

    under the old parameters you are still wrong about the allocation to bonds. the point of contention is not what i think but what financial planners advice. financial planners do not recommend 100% in bonds as you wrote. I gave you the links. you offer none. obfuscate your replies somewhere else. you cannot admit that you are wrong, i am putting you on ignore.
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2016
    #163     Oct 21, 2016
  4. ajcrshr

    ajcrshr



    Funny current Fed policy is very akin to the "supply-side economics" the liberals love to decry as a regurgitated talking point, but we hear almost zero from them in that regard even though the Fed is the most economically influential force. Clearly they support the Fed's thought that the wealth effect will trickle down to the average American instead of fleecing them through debasement. Seems very hypocritical..
     
    #164     Oct 21, 2016
    i960 likes this.
  5. birzos

    birzos

    Just watched "13 Hours", was taking a broadly balanced view, but only the pure evil of a psychopath can make comments “Did we survive the day?” and 'What difference, at this point, does it make?'.

    Anyone supporting that line is either in the same general category or an unfortunate lemming.
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2016
    #165     Oct 21, 2016
  6. Zzzz1

    Zzzz1

    I never said advisers advise to be 100% in bonds at any point. Glad you put me on ignore, and thanks for a link to some retail tard targeting news website as your source of authoritative investment advice.

     
    #166     Oct 21, 2016
  7. Sig

    Sig

    Don't get too down on the county based on NY. I've lived in Silicon Valley where it's the same insanity and it was easy to forget that this doesn't represent the other 98% of the country. Go to say Charlotte, Austin, or Denver and you'll find a pretty cool cosmopolitan city with far more reasonable housing prices, great public schools, and good infrastructure. Not to say you have a choice to move there, but at least it will give you a little hope for the country to know they're out there.
     
    #167     Oct 21, 2016
  8. How can a woman lead a nation in a sane society anyway?Bill is probably a victim of a constant domestic violence.
     
    #168     Oct 21, 2016
  9. Zzzz1

    Zzzz1

    I guess you are right, there is way more out there but as you also correctly stated sometimes the place to live is limited by career choices.

     
    #169     Oct 21, 2016
  10. piezoe

    piezoe

    There are opportunities of course. But if you are constrained in some way, e.g., no savings, working two jobs to make ends meet, etc., from your perspective they might as well not exist.
     
    #170     Oct 21, 2016