Didn't you omit something? If Hellary gets elected, what about millions and millions more rapists and murderers, really huge numbers, storming across the Mexican border, getting drivers licenses and voting to rig elections, and taking the jobs of honest hard working 'Amuricans.'
Your rants are ridiculous. You're like a liberal version of Trump. All you do is attack people for having different beliefs and try to shame them into not falling under your code of morals.
Nah, if you take 90% from a person making $1mln a year, this is not going to kill him. It's going to rob him but he will save his life. Sounds like a great idea.
are you in denial that a substantial number of muslims are savages? are you familiar at all with the history of the Middle East since World War II or even in the past few years?
the Left takes pleasure at taxing your income. think of every 5% increase in the tax rate as eating one ice cream cone. at some point your stomach collapses. even the Left understands the ruinous nature of a 90% tax rate for the economy if there were no loopholes. however,it makes them feel good to have it on the books.
have you been to the mid east? have you met Muslims in person? It sounds like you're talking out of your ass, obviously there are bad ones and good ones just like with every race/religion
The wonders of the non-answer, very good. So paraphrasing you are saying that pyramiding and the subsequent bipolar events are an acceptable way to run an economy.
Chuckle, we all deserve more than what either candidate delivered, so yes, we all do give a shit. And time was plenty available had she not constantly shot her zingers. Are you denying that the bar was set so incredibly low that Clinton looked to debate brilliantly when in reality her performance was not quite becoming of someone who wants to tackle some of the most massive issues any president has faced in the past 25 years? I am not even commenting on Trump as he failed completely from the get go. Please don't be angry, the presidency after all is all about serving people not about one person at the top. Thanks for referring me to her website, I have been there but it should not have to be necessary to have to read up on policy proposals on a website when there were 3 long debates in which she could have laid them out (the proposals) in much clearer detail. I see that it is first about winning and then performing the work but when Hilary talks about how her work is done on Nov 8 when in reality it should only start then that worries me and probably most others quite a bit.
That is all great for the poor but nowhere in your points does that benefit the middle class. The middle class works and is mostly insured and pension secured. The changes are really a drop in a bucket for the middle class which explains why she can't attract more middle class undecided potential voters. Nor has Hilary shown where the middle class wins. I am all for demanding a higher share from the rich and reallocate that to the bottom 20% or 30%. Many of the super rich actually agree with that. But there is very little for the middle class in her policy proposals.
you didn't paraphrase me. you extrapolated something I wrote into something that has nothing to do with my way of thinking. you also have shown a lack of understanding for a 2nd time what a black swan event is.