<iframe width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/BYGSC9wiOYE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
You said that newspapers in south america are saying obama is tough on immigration, so if the papers arent lying to them, and obama is pitching amnesty for kids, even if the kids have to have been in the country since 2012, which persons message is more to blame for the situation? _________________ is more responsible for the immigrants flooding to america,. A.) the newspaper who said that obama wouldnt let them in B.) Obama and the dems who said some of them will get in
There are two variables at work here, so watch out! this is where the going gets tough... "A Huffington Post review of Spanish-language and Latin American news reports found that while the region's newspapers often failed to emphasize the June 2012 cutoff date, they otherwise covered DACA accurately and included enough detail about the program to raise serious doubts that newly arrived migrants would be eligible. "Moreover, HuffPost found, Central American news media routinely portray Obama as tough on immigration, instead of creating the sense that the administration welcomes the undocumented. "Newspaper reporting from the region on DACA at the time the policy went into effect did not generally emphasize that those who entered after June of 2012 wouldn't benefit, though the reports often noted that applicants had to have lived continuously in the United States for five years. "More recent reporting about DACA in the leading papers for the region do not, by and large, contain factual inaccuracies, but they also rarely mention that the program excludes those who arrived after the cutoff date. " Maybe those mothers and kids are doing a cursory reading of their papers and shrieking, "we can go to America now!".
Ok, so the newspapers are both saying, he is tough on immigration, but at the same time they are talking about DACA, and not explaining it properly. I think we can both agree on that. Who created DACA? Even if the newspapers are not properly informed as it pertains to DACA, why are they reporting on it in the first place, who created it? If Obama was not here would these newspapers even be talking about DACA to behin with?
If it was me, id put on a mullet wig, grab a camaro, and rock born in the usa at the border in an attempt to get through, if that failed id probably just pay someone off <iframe width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/lZD4ezDbbu4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Lol, ok. Anyway, good fight. I'm off to a late lunch. Historical context, DACA: http://sites.duke.edu/daca/historical-context/
I'm going to go out on a limb here. Hillary will not run in 2016. Feel free to call me wrong if it happens, but I think she's just not going to do it. Just a gut feeling.
I think it depends on whether Bill thinks he can help her save the world from the demons released by Obama's incompetence. Like Obama, Hillary is not capable of doing the job on her own. She screws up everything. (That was not sexist as there are only a few men and women who can do the job well.... obviously) Whoever gets the job is going to have monumental problems after 8 years of the manifestation of just about all of the left's ideas.