Ok we are atleast getting somewhere, now, how would they have gotten that impression? Your huffington post article makes the laughable claim that the newspapers say obama is much harsher on immigration.
They would not believe Obama is tough on immigration if they think the DACA applies to them (or their kids).
don't forget about traitor Schumer threatening that if the Rs don't pass Amnesty by August the President will do it on his own Reid also made similar threats. So you have these traitors threatening to violate the constitution if Rs don't pass amnesty. And all of sudden you have 10s of thousands of central american families sending their kids to the border in anticipation of an amnesty deal.
What's so laughable about it, have you done a qualitative analysis of the topic in Central American papers yourself?
This picture from your article sums it up, it takes an extraordinary set of blinders to say that we are enforcing our immigration laws when something like this is happening, Do they really think we are trying to stop illegal immigration when there is a fucking line up at the fence of people who are getting through?
And where would they have gotten this impression? Do you think that mothers send their unaccompanied kids to the borders based on day to day banter, do you think that south american mothers are so stupid they just mishear a rumour and forfeit their kids based on it? I can see it now, a mother is having a cerveza at the bar when the guy next to him says "I heard if you send off your children to america they become millionaires" And then the mother just sends her kids to the border without thinking twice, unaccompanied. Besides crack heads what mother would do that?
They don't have to be stupid to misunderstand the provisions of the DACA (assuming they have access to those), but couple that misunderstanding with local fears and desperation and some percentage of mothers will. And some kids are going to try anyway, for family's sake. "Individuals who request deferred action must have: Been under the age of 31 on June 15, 2012 Arrived to the United States before reaching their 16th birthday Continuously resided in the United States from June 15, 2007 (last five years) to the present Been physically present in the United States on June 15, 2012, as well as at the time of requesting deferred action from USCIS; Entered without inspection before June 15, 2012, or had any lawful immigration status expired on or before June 15, 2012 Been in school at the time of application, or have already graduated or obtained a certificate of completion from high school, or have obtained a general education development (GED) certificate, or are an honorably discharged veteran of the U.S. Coast Guard or the U.S. Armed Forces Not been convicted of a felony, significant misdemeanor, or three or more other misdemeanors, and do not otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety"
So now we have come full circle, and you are admitting that the reason they are coming is because of implied amnesty....... which was implied by who?