Hillary Clinton Did It: The Editorial Board WALL STREET JOURNAL

Discussion in 'Politics' started by traderob, May 23, 2022.

  1. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    Wasn't his purview---
     
    #11     May 23, 2022
    traderob likes this.
  2. easymon1

    easymon1

    zzzwc.jpg
     
    #12     May 25, 2022
    Buy1Sell2 likes this.
  3. #13     May 25, 2022
  4. easymon1

    easymon1

    No problemo, I don't take you to be any sort of reliable source, lol.
    Can you point out what it is you are calling into question specifically freddy?
     
    #14     May 25, 2022
    traderob likes this.
  5. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    #15     May 26, 2022
  6. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    #16     May 26, 2022
  7. The FBI was doing the same thing as Hillary was doing- ie. leaking stories/rumors to the press to get the press to report on them and then using those press reports as a basis to get warrants and to justify more investigation.

    They were all playing on the same team.
     
    #17     May 26, 2022
    elderado and traderob like this.
  8. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Michael Sussmann found not guilty of charges brought by Special Prosecutor John Durham
    Sussmann had been accused of lying to the FBI
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/michael-sussmann-not-guilty-special-prosecutor-john-durham

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The jury on Tuesday found Michael Sussmann not guilty of making a false statement to the FBI in September 2016 when he said he was not working on behalf of any client, when he brought information alleging a covert communications channel between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank.

    After a two week trial, and more than a day of deliberations, the jury found that Special Counsel John Durham’s team had not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Sussmann’s statement was a lie, and that he was, in fact, working on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and technology executive Rodney Joffe when he brought two thumb drives and a white paper alleging a Trump-Russia connection.

    Sussmann was charged with one count of making a false statement to the FBI during his meeting with then-FBI General Counsel James Baker on Sept. 19, 2016.

    While we are disappointed in the outcome, we respect the jury’s decision and thank them for their service," Durham said in a statement. "I also want to recognize and thank the investigators and the prosecution team for their dedicated efforts in seeking truth and justice in this case."

    The jury included one federal government employee who told the judge they donated to Democrats in 2016 and another government employee who told the judge they "strongly" dislike former President Trump. Both of those jurors told the judge they could be impartial throughout the trial.

    The jury also included a teacher, an illustrator, a mechanic and more. One juror had a child who was on the same high school sports team as Sussmann's child.

    The overwhelming majority of jurors selected told Cooper they had not heard of the case prior to jury service.

    Durham’s team presented billing records dated beginning on July 29, 2016 and through October 2016, revealing Sussmann repeatedly billed the Clinton campaign for work on the Alfa Bank opposition research against Trump.

    The government, during closing arguments, reminded jurors of a key text message Sussmann sent to Baker on the night before his FBI meeting on Sept. 19, 2016. Durham’s team alleged Sussmann put his "lie in writing" in his Sept. 18, 2016, text to Baker.

    (More at above url)
     
    #18     May 31, 2022
    Bugenhagen likes this.
  9. ipatent

    ipatent

    It's hard to get a politically neutral jury in DC.
     
    #19     May 31, 2022
    elderado likes this.
  10. Bugenhagen

    Bugenhagen

    Another major defeat for Reality1Fantasy2.

    Fox with the sour grapes questions the validity of the whole jury of peers thing again.
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2022
    #20     May 31, 2022