Hillary Clinton attacks Israel...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by OPTIONAL777, Mar 12, 2010.

  1. ...(I guess now the Zionists will claim that Hillary Clinton along with Joe Biden are anti-Semitic)...

    WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Friday delivered a stinging rebuke to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his government's announcement this week of new Jewish housing in east Jerusalem, calling it "a deeply negative signal" for the Mideast peace process and ties with the U.S.

  2. Wallet


    I think Israel has seen it's ties with the U.S. weaken by "deeply negative signals" sent by the current administration. Forcing Israel to give up land when the promise of U.S. intervention in regards to the nuclear situation in Iran falters ain't gonna fly with the Israelis.

    When their faith in the U.S. to back them is no longer there, they will act in their own defense, with preemptive strikes. The U.S. has kept the collar on them, but it's about to come off.

    Hilary and Biden can yell all they want, they don't care.

    While the world probably questions the current resolve of the U.S. they know Israel won't take shit off anybody, Mideast will probably like it better dealing with the U.S.
  3. fhl


  4. Israel wants to nuke Iran, period.

    The voted in Netyannukeyou to do the job.

    Get long crude oil, you can be the Israel traders will before they strike Iran...

    Watch the long futures crude contracts on this type of news...
  5. Wallet


    More like Israel wants to get rid of Iran's nukes before Iran does what it said it would, use them on Israel the first chance they get.
  6. "More like Israel wants to get rid of Iran's nukes..."

    Iran has nukes?

    (...and Iraq had weapons of mass destruction...)

    If Iran has nukes, why haven't they used them yet on Israel?

  7. +10
  8. Ricter


    Good, cut off the money then.

    -50 billion.
  9. Wallet


    Why ask stupid questions?

    Iran has openly admitted they are working towards that goal. No they do not have them yet, but why would you wait if your goal is preemptive.

    And yes Iraq had chemical and biological agents, they had already used them in conflicts with Iran and on the Kurds. When you give someone enough time to move them before you come knocking on the door............ guess what?
  10. So you are the smart one, eh?

    Yet you couldn't even answer the questions...

    Let me guess...you are a neocon.

    #10     Mar 13, 2010