Keep it simple. You get the answer then. Hillary just wants to be President. That is the top and bottom. She will be cautious in power as she is in trying to get to the top slot.
" She wants government to make every decision in your life." Mav, the objective...no hyperbole from Mav... LOL... Mav, I am sure Chicago is large enough that there is a treatment center and recovery program for Hillaryphobics...
Zzz, you really need to stop passing judgement. I have said it before and I will say it again. She will be the next President of the US and I don't have a problem with that. No Hillary Phobia here. Take off the blinders and put down the Kool Aid. Back to the ad, it was effective and kudos to the Obama people for taking a shot to her head. That took guts. It will be interesting to see her response.
The ad was apparently effective on you... If it really was the Obama people, I feel sorry for them. Hell hath no fury like a Clinton scorned...and the money and power to exercise it. I have no blinders on at all Mav, I don't actively support any of the candidates that I see running right now, and have stated my requirements for support at this point in the election process in the Ron Paul thread... The 2008 election will likely come down again to a choice of the evil of two lessors...
which would you rather have, another big government big spender republican who pretends not to be, or someone who declares their intentions up front. it's probably going to be big government either way if it was up to me we'd have ron paul giving uncle sam a lypo... but it ain't gonna happen. as far as spending, bloating and true taxation are concerned, we'll be paying bush's bills for a long ass time
AC, if you honestly believe there is any difference between the Bush dynasty and the Clinton dynasty then you are letting your biases get the better of you. And for once I'm going to agree with Zzz, this Ron Paul support you seem to have as well as a few others is you pulling out your Swiss card and not wanting to go on the record to support one side or the other. Ron Paul is another salesmen in a different suit. If he was the true libertarian messiah that many on here want to believe, the libertarians would actually be supporting him which they are NOT.
that's what i'm trying to say. they'll probably spend the same way, but at least on the clinton side by declaring the intention, i don't get that creepy deceptive sense that i always did from bush. he swindled the heck out of you guys on spending and tax. classic liar deadbeat re ron paul, i just like his willingness to speak candidly on our unsustainable fiscal/monetary policy while most of govt ignores the elephant in the room. don't really care if the libertarians can agree on him... it's pretty much moot i would think curious though, what do you see as his hidden agenda also, i guess if you see the left and right as being no different, why take a side. is there some other good reason to align with political parties you feel are diff faces on the same animal
Probably at the end of the day there is little difference between Hillary's policies and those of Obama. Since Hillary is the front runner, Obama has to do something to differentiate himself. This vid does that brilliantly. A lot of Democrat primary voters are not deep thinkers. They are emotional voters with little loyalty to any particular pol. Obama has branded himself as new and fresh and tarred Hillary as old, boring and somewhat threatening. In addition, he keeps the full court press on Hillary. She has already made mistakes, and his camp has to think if they keep the pressure on, she will make more.
aaa you're dying to see that youtube hack as an obama item. for chrissakes there's no way - i know you know better. funny tho to see you wishing it had some kind of divide-and-conquer traction