Hillary 2020

Cuddles · Sep 29, 2019

vanzandt said:
"Big consequences"
rotflmao...
Trumpy's doubling down on the firing squad for spies.

Edit... but still no retorts for Hillary.
Oh its gonna be good....
________________________________________________________
Donald J. Trump
‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump
12s12 seconds ago

....In addition, I want to meet not only my accuser, who presented SECOND & THIRD HAND INFORMATION, but also the person who illegally gave this information, which was largely incorrect, to the “Whistleblower.” Was this person SPYING on the U.S. President? Big Consequences!
1 reply 3 retweets 0 likes
Show this thread
Donald J. Trump
‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump
13s13 seconds ago

His lies were made in perhaps the most blatant and sinister manner ever seen in the great Chamber. He wrote down and read terrible things, then said it was from the mouth of the President of the United States. I want Schiff questioned at the highest level for Fraud & Treason.....
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Show this thread
Donald J. Trump
‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump
14s14 seconds ago

Like every American, I deserve to meet my accuser, especially when this accuser, the so-called “Whistleblower,” represented a perfect conversation with a foreign leader in a totally inaccurate and fraudulent way. Then Schiff made up what I actually said by lying to Congress......
7 replies 4 retweets 4 likes
More...

So he wants to meet his accuser in a trial setting? Moscow Mitch can arrange that

Tony Stark · Sep 29, 2019

vanzandt said:
"Big consequences"
rotflmao...
Trumpy's doubling down on the firing squad for spies.

Edit... but still no retorts for Hillary.
Oh its gonna be good....

Edit #2... Schiff questioned for "treason"? !
Should he get the gallows or the firing squad?
South lawn or the Capitol steps?
Will the executioner's proffered hood say "MAGA?"
Will it have been made in China?
Will Nancy speak out?
________________________________________________________
Donald J. Trump
‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump
12s12 seconds ago

....In addition, I want to meet not only my accuser, who presented SECOND & THIRD HAND INFORMATION, but also the person who illegally gave this information, which was largely incorrect, to the “Whistleblower.” Was this person SPYING on the U.S. President? Big Consequences!
1 reply 3 retweets 0 likes
Show this thread
Donald J. Trump
‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump
13s13 seconds ago

His lies were made in perhaps the most blatant and sinister manner ever seen in the great Chamber. He wrote down and read terrible things, then said it was from the mouth of the President of the United States. I want Schiff questioned at the highest level for Fraud & Treason.....
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Show this thread
Donald J. Trump
‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump
14s14 seconds ago

Like every American, I deserve to meet my accuser, especially when this accuser, the so-called “Whistleblower,” represented a perfect conversation with a foreign leader in a totally inaccurate and fraudulent way. Then Schiff made up what I actually said by lying to Congress......
7 replies 4 retweets 4 likes
More...

Triggered!!!

UsualName · Sep 30, 2019

Hillary bringing the heat:

LacesOut · Sep 30, 2019

TreeFrogTrader said:
Barr is hard a work.

Can't find your emails Hillary? Let Bill Barr help.

From the Washington Post - today

The Trump administration is investigating the email records of dozens of current and former senior State Department officials who sent messages to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email, reviving a politically toxic matter that overshadowed the 2016 election, current and former officials said.

As many as 130 officials have been contacted in recent weeks by State Department investigators — a list that includes senior officials who reported directly to Clinton as well as others in lower-level jobs whose emails were at some point relayed to her inbox, said current and former State Department officials. Those targeted were notified that emails they sent years ago have been retroactively classified and now constitute potential security violations, according to letters reviewed by The Washington Post.

State Department investigators began contacting the former officials about 18 months ago, after President Trump’s election, and then seemed to drop the effort before picking it up in August, officials said.

Senior State Department officials said that they are following standard protocol in an investigation that began during the latter days of the Obama administration and is nearing completion.

“This has nothing to do with who is in the White House,” said a senior State Department official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about an ongoing probe. “This is about the time it took to go through millions of emails, which is about 3½ years.”

To many of those under scrutiny, including some of the Democratic Party’s top foreign policy experts, the recent flurry of activity surrounding the Clinton email case represents a new front on which the Trump administration could be accused of employing the powers of the executive branch against perceived political adversaries.
More...

Wait - isn't it illegal, or impeachable, to try to root out Demotard corruption?

vanzandt · Sep 30, 2019

Now this is interesting. Hillary just Tweeted this 3 hours ago, like she's spoiling for a fight and didn't get a response from Trump the first time.
What's her game?

Hillary Clinton
‏Verified account @HillaryClinton
3h3 hours ago

The president is a corrupt human tornado.
11,504 replies 24,328 retweets 137,261 likes

Tsing Tao · Sep 30, 2019

vanzandt said:
What's her game?
More...

If I had to guess, her game is about stopping people from forgetting about her completely.

vanzandt · Sep 30, 2019

DTB2 said:
Sexy AF
More...

Buy1Sell2 · Sep 30, 2019

vanzandt said:
View attachment 210174
More...

Grotesque

Buy1Sell2 · Sep 30, 2019

---a little better---- at least on the left

Tsing Tao · Sep 30, 2019

Anyone wanna guess as to why, after losing the election in 2016, tens of millions of dollars less went to the Clinton Foundation Charity? I mean, if it was for charity, why would losing the election matter?