I am not sure what is the significance of the 420k year data you posted on from the ice cores studies to what I posted in this thread. The study from Meehl et al. makes no connection or inference on the CO2, dust level and global warming. It showed that in the past 4 out of 5 decades, there is a significant recorded higher highs than lower lows of continental US tempearatures, suggestive of warming. The long term data is useful for a baseline study of global temperature to other climate factors, but if you want to study human effects on climate changes, the significant data are in the last few hundred years, not hundreds of thousands of years ago when the human population was in the tens of thousands.
So, you retract your totally implausible claim the GW is due to the increasing solar radiation due to solar evolution over time scales of the order of a billion years? Or like the great majority of deniers, keep repeating nonsense that is demonstrably false, in the hope of confusing and obfuscating the issues? You see, truth does not matter to the most vocal of the deniers - just their peculiar brand of right wing politics.
I'm sorry you misunderstood I was merely pointing out "the burnt cinder future" information the likes of which is probably news to the IPCC . 4 salient points 1) I think AGW is wrong or vastly overstated. 2) The monstrous hubris that man can control the earth's climate is laughable. 3)So far all the solutions for AGW are civilization killers anyway. 4) Even if the predictions by IPCC are correct: I DON"T CARE, IT'S NO BIG DEAL when compared to real threats that exist.
the sample size is not large enough to reach a concrete conclusion In any event, the environment will slowly deteriorate anyway, we should spend more time and money developing inter-planetary travel and astrobiology than this claptrap, eventually if mankind is to survive it will have to leave earth.