Interesting former low carb blogger post : https://deniseminger.com/2015/10/06...-a-call-for-some-evolution-of-thought-part-1/
Can someone give a few meals (Breakfast lunch dinner) that would be good for weight loss based on this philosophy? I can eat grilled chicken and broccoli till the cows come home. Eggs n cucumbers. But man it gets so boring.
Indeed. And the researcher in the video you posted, Susan Jebb, figures prominently. http://www.whale.to/a/bmj_investigation_reveals.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/hea...ebb-took-research-funding-from-Coca-Cola.html David Stuckler, professor of political economy and sociology at Oxford University, said: “There are inherent conflicts of interest between corporations that profit from unhealthy food and public health collaborations.” In 2013 a study by the medical journal Plos found that reviews of the effects of sugary drinks on obesity with industry funding were five times more likely to conclude that there was no link than those without industry funding. There is no justification for sugar that doesn't occur naturally in foods (added sugar). None. Remember what Big Sugar did to John Yudkin? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Yudkin#Pure.2C_White_and_Deadly Shades of Big Tobacco.
It's not so much a matter of "what to eat", but "what not to eat". Avoid/restrict processed foods. Avoid/restrict foods with high glycemic index. Limit calories to 1800/day. You'll get there. Personally, I like my home made chili any time of day. Ground beef, tomatoes, beans, onions, spices.
Eat what you like too but keep the macros in the "MAGIC" zone. Use https://cronometer.com/ to help keep track. If high carb/low fat then ratios should be around 65-70% carbs/20-25% protein/ 10% or less fat. Reverse ratios if your diet is high fat/low carb.
I get it, your not a big fan of refined carbohydrates even though they contradict the results of Walter Kempner. Here's the link again. ( scroll down to Kempner ) https://deniseminger.com/2015/10/06...-a-call-for-some-evolution-of-thought-part-1/
I don't get it, why are all these nutritionists lump all people into a single group? For example, I am 5'10', weighing 140 lbs at 8% body fat and I am trying to bring my weight down to mid 130s with 4-5% body fat (as I always do to peak for my climbing projects). How could any nutrition study compare me with some dude that weighs 300 lbs and trying to lose 70lbs of fat so he doesn't keel over from heart failure? The whole field just sounds so much like bad science because of it.