RRY16 may deserve some credit himself as being a bullsh**er because it seems likely he also posts under Destriero. Having multiple alias seems disingenuous to me. My theory of RRY16 and Destriero being the same person is based on the simularity of their posts: 1. They both love acronyms. 2. They rank one and two of the most negative posters on ET in my opinion. 3. Two threads were started independently, at different times, and by different posters complaining about RRY16 in one thread and Destriero in another thread. 4. They both quickly call bulls**t or accuse someone of trolling without consistently providing solid evidence for their claims. 5. Less strong, and a minor consideration are the locations they put in their profiles. Tahoe/Reno for Destriero and California for RRY16. 6. Both RRY16 and Destriero are both outspoken for Leftist ideology. But Destriero has let be known he has me on ignore, but he also has been known to view posts by people he ignores. The fact Destriero has not called me out directly on subjects he would have a strong, differing opinion on is out of character for him. This implies to me he is doing so through his RRY16 alt. Again, based on the above circumstantial evidence, I believe RRY16 and Destriero are the same person and it is hypocritical of this poster to accuse others of bulls**ting. One way to verify this is through an IP address comparison between RRY16 and Destriero, but I don’t quite care enough to bother requesting this. Besides, both alts are mostly harmless and provide good entertainment value.
lol max, your pattern recognition skills are horrible. Ask Baron to run an IP match on both of us. Then call a cop.
A mere $600,000 per household... Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal will cost $93 trillion, group says https://finance.yahoo.com/news/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-apos-green-191307889.html In analysis published on Monday, the American Action Forum -- which is headed by a former director of the Congressional Budget Office, Douglas Holtz-Eakin -- estimated that the New York Democrat’s policy proposal could end up costing somewhere between $51 trillion and $93 trillion over the course of the next decade. “The Green New Deal is clearly very expensive,” the authors of the study wrote. “Its further expansion of the federal government’s role in some of the most basic decisions of daily life, however, would likely have a more lasting and damaging impact than its enormous price tag.” Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., unveiled a blueprint of their Green New Deal resolution at the beginning of the month; since then, it’s garnered the support of several notable Democratic senators, including presidential hopefuls Sens. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., and Cory Booker, D-N.J. In the deal, Ocasio-Cortez and Markey laid out expansive proposals to not only aggressively reduce greenhouse gas emissions over the next three decades, but to guarantee millions of “good, high-wage jobs” while ensuring economic security for all Americans. The resolution also calls for huge investments in climate-friendly infrastructure, in addition to protections for indigenous people, communities of color, the poor and others considered to be a part of a “vulnerable community.”According to the American Action Forum, however, eliminating carbon emissions from the transportation system could cost somewhere between $1.3 trillion and $2.7 trillion, while guaranteeing a job to every American would cost between $6.8 trillion and $44.6 trillion. Universal health care, meanwhile, is estimated close to $36 trillion. Supporters of the proposal, however, argued that the cost of not implementing federal policies to fight climate change would far exceed that of the Green New Deal. “Any so-called "analysis" of the #GreenNewDeal that includes artificially inflated numbers that rely on lazy assumptions, incl. about policies that aren’t even in the resolution is bogus,” Markey wrote on Twitter. “Putting a price on a resolution of principles, not policies, is just Big Oil misinformation.”
Your brief posting history suggests you have zero common sense and perspective on the world. You are irrelevant, perhaps that is why you lash out at "the left". And congratulations on your post getting liked by the resident racist and conspiracy theorist; some might see that as a red flag but maybe that's the crowd you like to run with.
I always know when you bullshitters are full of it when you use the IP Address to verify out. Read your posts from the beginning, your story doesn’t add up.. Nothing wrong with posting but quit the nonsense about who you are , nobody gives a rip.
This is one of your posts....Lol, how’s Xela? What a fool and a tool you are. 45 Posts 18 Likes 1. Generally women cannot outsmart men. It's a genetic thing and I am not being sexist here. Look at motorsports, sports, cookery, inventions, and so on. 2. Women mostly are susceptible to emotions. They can be swayed easily by emotions. That's the reason why I think putting a woman at a decision-making position is a big no no. However, there's an exception to everything. Some women are exceptionally smart and can outsmart or outperform most men. I believe Xela is the exception. Also, she is very humble and willing to answer questions. To be honest, men are wired genetically to not accept defeat from a woman. So, forgive them. #68 Nov 21, 2017 Share Turveyd likes this.
And yet, you have on several occasions made an issue of what I say I've done and what I've implied I've done. This tells me you do indeed care what I and others do for a living. The fact that you respond to other posts is by definition proof you are interested in some way in either showing your approval or disapproval in what the other person is saying. Your statement that nobody cares is another pathetic attempt at bulls**t on your part. Your world may be small and perhaps you seek some sort of Internet validation by ragging on others, but you've picked the wrong victim. I'm not the only one who has called both you and Destriero out, assuming you are both not related to each other. Some people might take a hint their behavior is over the top when threads are started complaining about them and many other posters chime in their agreement. But not you. Or Destriero. You are both too dense. Perhaps it's a family affair. As far as Destriero's suggestion of IP verification, his suggestion is enough to make me believe you and Destriero are not the exact same person. As far as the both of you having different personalities, I'm not so convinced. As stated in my other post, I don't care quite enough to bother with actually verifying IP addresses.