since the first day the FBI searched cohen's offices some of us figured trump was in trouble. they probably have all of trump's communications with cohen via illegal surveillance. The five eyes program is real. They get everything. They would just have to ask Canada or England what they have on Trump. so they know what trump was saying to his lawyer. If he is guilty of something, now they are just gather evidence they can use in court.
That explains the panic then. STOP MUELLER!! Imagine if liberals said the same about the multiple Clinton investigations, you guys would be convinced that Arkancide was real.
1. No, this was all broken by NYT 2. You didn't explain - spy about what? 3. The person is vehemently anti-Russia, no evidence that FBI asked him to do what he did. My point is that this guy was an informant because other than the Russia stuff - what exactly is there to spy on?
Please link to the story where you claim they broke the news. The earliest one I found is where they responding to the information that was already out and they pretty much gave the FBI spin on it. They may have given us more info about the identity in that article but they did not break the story of having a spy in Trump's camp. (Unless you produce an earlier link. Which you might... I do not know.) 2. You are the one who has to explain spy about what. He was carrying on an operation for the FBI on Papadoupolis.... that is spying. The subject matter is irrelevant... he was spying or not is the question right now. Once you concede he was spying then you can explain how it was part of a legitimate investigation or not. 3. You think he tried to set up Papadoupolis without the FBI's permission. You are grasping at straws here. Less than one percent change he was no coordinating with the FBI. 4. Your last point is your weakest argument. It cuts against the FBI... it makes it look like they were spying for political reasons if they can't come up with a reason why they were spying.
Imagine a squawking and flapping that would come from exGOPer and his ilk if anyone called the previous president a baboon.
He's apparently not even an American (and therefore couldn't be an "exGOPer") - because quite frankly Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer don't get nearly as hyper partisan and neurotically hysterical as "exGOPer".