HERE IS THE EVIDENCE

Discussion in 'Politics' started by easymon1, Nov 25, 2020.

  1. The first witness I heard was credible. I will listen to more witness statements at a later time. Democrats were extremely well organized across multiple vote processing centers in multiple states. Non Democrat poll watchers and related positions were trained, but were not given a narrative to follow, as was the case for Democrat election workers. This narrative was to supress the efforts to validate to ballots. In addition, how is it the vast majority of ballot processors are Democrats? Are these processors part of protest groups such as Antifa, a designated domestic terrorist organization? What were the hiring standards and were applicants denied employment because of their political affiliation or where they lived? Was there in effect a redlining policy where only those who lived in certain heavy Democrat supporting zip codes would be hired? Was there descrimination based age where political affiliation was not confirmed? Given the extreme media bias and polarization against Trump, is the media complicit in helping to create an environment where election fraud is justified and encouraged? Was does kind of message would you imagine gets sent to potential wrongdoers when prosecutors in Democrat pollically controlled jurisdictions do not prosecute criminal activity, including violent and property damaging riots?

    Back to the witness statements. The witness gave a couple of examples of invalid ballots being knowingly counted. The systematic counting of invalid ballots alone may justify invalidating the the results of the ballots processing center. Transparency was not maintained as the non-Democrat poll watchers were selectively and apparently exclusively kicked out. Intimidation was used to distract poll watchers from doing their jobs. Why would anyone want to distract poll watchers from doing their jobs? Could it be the distractors don’t want to get caught doing illegal acts? Further, given the number of apparently Lefist legal students on site, what does this suggest the state of our legal profession? The Communists certaintly have targeted education facilities, especially journalism. Now it appears the legal profession was targeted as well. I would like to hear young, Conservative journalists and attorneys discuss their experiences in colleges known for their Liberal professors. If we can find any who attended the colleges in question.

    If the Democrats don’t want to play nice, why should we? This election is increasingly looking like last call for our Democracy. Hopefully some of the Republican judges that have ruled against the Trump Campaign who still believe in Democracy will recuse themselves and offer their assistance to the Trump Campaign. After all, it is their Democracy, too.
     
    #21     Dec 2, 2020
  2. easymon1

    easymon1

    auditing.jpg
     
    #22     Dec 3, 2020
  3. UsualName

    UsualName

    They said they had the best witnesses...

    F8B42F28-D234-4AB8-ACDB-5AA4082D3CBF.jpeg
     
    #23     Dec 5, 2020
  4. easymon1

    easymon1

    LOL, And Still, she knows BS when she sees it. lol

     
    #24     Dec 5, 2020
  5. DTB2

    DTB2

    Legal teams have to the witnesses as they come. Some have stellar credentials and BS testimony, that would be referred to as a Vindman.
    Others have many warts but tell the truth about important subjects. We will see how it plays out.
     
    #25     Dec 5, 2020
  6. easymon1

    easymon1

    delete ad;e.jpg
     
    #26     Dec 5, 2020
    DTB2 likes this.
  7. easymon1

    easymon1

    Election Fraud 891.jpg
     
    #27     Dec 5, 2020
  8. Overnight

    Overnight

    I know Commander Data there, but is the one above him Al Capone?
     
    #28     Dec 5, 2020
  9. easymon1

    easymon1

     
    #29     Dec 6, 2020
  10. What? No video? Now that was disappointing. :D
     
    #30     Dec 6, 2020