No they did not. Scientists never say "will" they say "may". So until the real quotes are presented, which are those of individual scientists not a consensus, these quotes, like virtually everything the denialists post, is bullshit.
This took about 3 seconds to search Google and prove you wrong again. http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes Underline mine. Oh, look. They used the word "conclusions" as well. Yep, you are still a dumb ass.
Here is another one: http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warmin...rricanes-and-climate-change.html#.VO_zzPkc6f4 Underline and bold mine. You just make shit up and think it is true just like a good little libtard.
Fraud, Here is an example of some libtard group. http://www.nrdc.org/globalwarming/fcons/fcons1.asp Bold and underline mine. As I stated in the other thread, you embarrass yourself every time that you post. But, you are too fucking stupid to realize it.
Yeah but none of the quotes in your retarded cartoon used the word "will". Nor were those things said by the science community as a whole. There was no consensus on any of those things.
Let's just look at the first two. They are wrong. There was no consensus in the seventies on climate trends however more science was predicting global warming. The rest of the so called quotes are similarly bullshit. Typical denialist bullshit. Morons like wdt2 eat up the shit.
"As of February 25, the February 2015 temperature anomaly over eastern Ontario and south-western Québec was never observed before since 1900 making it a 115-year return period event (1 case out of 115 years). The second coldest was 1979. Previous to 1900, there is 1889 which had a colder February than 2015, but data are more or less reliable in those years." February 2015 coldest in 115 years http://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/february-2015-coldest-in-115-years-1.2257188