You mean your shit degree? That is not a science education. You didn't take the same core classes as scientists and engineers. You took "Math for Environmentalists". You did not learn differential equations. You did not take proper dynamics of any kind. You took the dumbed-down versions of chemistry and physics, not the core courses required for an actual science or engineering degree. You don't mention the school so it isn't likely well regarded. To me you are just some rather unpleasant kid with a crap degree who has been brainwashed by those who wish to damage capitalism by having gullible not-so-bright people like you do their bidding. I believe the term is Useful Idiot.
Actually it is an excellent degree for understanding from a wholistic perspective, the biosphere and it's physical systems. As opposed to most speciality degrees, mine involves all the sciences. But again you don't seem to get it because you are a deluded ignorant righty, what matters is what these true experts - as opposed to what you are - say.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change Not to mention that the basic science of AGW (CO2 is a greenhouse gas and we have raised it's levels by 40% and we are seeing the resulting warming) is quite simple and logical. A ten year old can understand it, but you can't. That makes you dumber than a ten year old. The degree has little to do with it. In fact, because you have a degree, and despite it think AGW is a hoax, means you are even something worse than dumb.
You've proved my point. Science is not "holistic" it is empirical. You spew that which you do not understand. You are a shrill child who thinks he scores points when he insults. A puppy.
What does the future hold for an Environmental Sciences major with a sub-par GPA... either McDonald's drive thru line employment or if they fail at that they become a HVAC "technician".
To understand interacting systems one certainly needs to be holistic. The fault with specialists such as yourself is that you have no over-arching conception of what is going on. Your specificity restricts you to a myopic and insufficient view. But again, one needn't have a degree or even be particularly intelligent, to understand the fact of AGW. Yet you are unable to or to even give any reason why you don't other than a dogmatic ideological knee-jerk "AGW is a hoax". Pretty pathetic if you ask me.
AGW is a hoax. A critical mass of people have begun to understand this. You are unqualified and unequipped for the subject and I doubt you would have lasted more than a few weeks in any real science curriculum. Many of my friends in school didn't make it through and were weeded out by certain courses designed to do just that. Weed out those who couldn't hack. It was an unholy bitch and left me intolerant of pikers like you who don't know a fucking thing yet try to institute massive changes to society. Some guy driving around in a little white utility truck is gonna tell me how to live my life? Fuck off.
Yet you are the one denying the common sense obvious science and the opinion of virtually the entire world's science community. Like I said, no amount of education can negate that stupidity. You are worse than merely ignorant.
"common sense obvious science" Nonsense. You are not qualified to open your mouth regarding climate or atmospheric chemistry. I would no more heed your words than I would attempt to discuss quantum mechanics with a baboon.
Try me. Nice way to just cop-out from showing any knowledge. Afraid that you will look stupid? Too late. So far you have given no rational reason to deny that which over 97% of the world's climate scientists agree on. Did you even bother to look at this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change How about this? http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ You've got nothing but pig-headed denial of the facts.