Baby seals? The only animal that should be clubbed to death for profit around here is you AAA. You might finally get to touch a lady's naughty bits.
So you basically evaded the question again and couldn't dispute my last post too. So again, you try to change the subject. And you brought up the "chart crap". I merely stated an objective fact which is shown by your own chart: incidents have increased since 1990 and gun free zones were created in that year. There is no interpretation here. These are facts. So there is no dispute to the reality that since their creation, incidents did not decrease. Simple. And my question still stands.
Do tell me where the contradiction is.... And while you're at it, please answer the question you insist in avoiding. I'm not blowing any steam, I'm simply calmly making a question which you simply can't answer. Go ahead, run away and block me, I would expect nothing less from a leftist. I couldn't care less if you block me or not.
I evaded nothing worth answering For the same reason you are a short-bus trader, you don't see how hopeless your 'clever' argument is. (Give him a year.. or seven or ten?). Maybe Leonardo can explain it to you? He is less prone to distractions. Younger generation eh?
At least you admit you evaded it! Contrary to your buddy up there! How convenient to you, you simply classify what you are not capable of answering (if you could you would have done so by now) as "not worth it" and simply evade it... I always have a blast with you leftists always embarrassing yourselves when faced with logic!
I'll put it another way. You know I used to help out with mentally disabled men at a vocational training center? Well I did. One day in a large equipment shed by the garden center, one of the down syndrome lads was staring fixedly at the steel roof 20 feet above. Another had thrown some dog shit up there and it stuck. He asked me why did it not come down? Now.. I could have explained about adhesion and cohesion, Van der Waals forces or acid-base interactions with the dooky and the roof... in my seconds of delay he explained it to me. "Donal threw it so hard it would go into space! it it still going up!" and a few seconds later it fell. He was happy, I was happy he was happy? Kind of like that with you today really.
Good for you! But you still aren't able to answer my question and I dare you to do so. No amount of lack of education will change the fact that you aren't capable of answering it.
But I did answer. Just done some opening trades and I'm cooking baked potatoes now with proper crunchy skins, these are a novelty in Colombia. I have some imported baked beans in tomato sauce from the UK and Philadelphia... Do you like baked potatoes? I'll post a photo later for you.
Quite the other way around, you admited evading it... You're attempts to keep evading answering it are quite embarrassing, not to bluntly say pathetic... But I'll post it again here. Feel free to answer it, if you're capable of it and want to stop running from it. "Given that guns are here to stay. How can laws be used to prevent people who have no respect for laws from getting their hands on guns?" You avoided this question from the beginning, because this is the crucial point and this is where all your propositions are shown to be absurd. Because all your propositions are law, and people that follow the law don't do mass shootings and the people who do,obviously couldn't care less about ANY LAW"
As you can see I have been busy: And now we are watching The Post. Might be a while. Is your question re-framed to mean any people anywhere or are we still in the realm of school shooters?