This a pattern with Gayfly. Like when he got the meaning of treason wrong, then admitted it, then flip-flopped again and tried to obfuscate by accusing me of "false pedantry" for insisting on the Constitution's definition of treason instead of the ever changing definition in his head. Hoodooman, thank you for the clarification. "Treasonous" should be replaced with "seditious" in the thread title and text. Much appreciated. As I noted earlier, hoodooman aptly pointed to the distinction between treason and sedition, for which I am grateful. The mistake was mine. Therefore, and I repeat, let's go with sedition. No. I got it right the first time. You are just too busy engaging in false pedantry to recognize it.
Gabs needs the debates to devolve to ad hominem as quickly as possible because he doesn't actually like the factual portion of these arguments, he gets his entertainment when it becomes an exchange of insults. That is what the man likes. My guess is that he is not in any position to voice his opinions in his personal or professional life. People like that sometimes find an avenue for expressing themselves a bit more freely than is possible in real life. Some end up in strip clubs and some hurl insults with glee on the internet. Others cross-dress or become paintball fanatics. You get the picture. Oppressive job environment and fat psychopathic wife makes Jack a Dull Boy.
Let's see if we can connect these dots: 1. Index Piker is a blatant racist who clearly wrote in a post that he would be okay with the president assassinated. 2. I took him to task and called him out, since his sentiments are of a treasonous nature. Not acts, but sentiments. 3. You never once criticized Index Piker directly for his remarks by telling him so. Rather, knowing full well what he wrote, you chose to go pendantic on me instead regarding my disgust about those very same remarks of his. Repeatedly. But never once did you attack or criticize Index Piker directly. And only after numerous attacks on me did you once suggest that you didn't approve of Index Piker's comments. But it was with a much lighter hand and only in passing by comparison. 4. For every mildly negative remark about Index Piker on your part, you have made at least a dozen vitriolic remarks about me for taking Index Piker to task. 5. Therefore, you attack those who call racists who want to see the president assassinated, but you virtually condone and appease the actual racist himself by comparison. Conclusion: For all intents and purposes, Trader666 appeases and condones racism and the idea of presidential assassination.
Yep apparently corporatebankteller1 was so succesful in his canadian banking career that he now despises capitalism, and trolls the internet calling all americans who disagree with him racists while trying to figure out how to trade off sub 1 minute charts.... LOL he is clearly either seriously disturbed or a total fucking loser..... i would suspect the latter......
LOL you are the only person on this site who manages to sidetrack people like this i proved what a bitch you are, i need to leave now to meet my friends at arizonas, the offer still stands when you want to prove what a successfull "corporate fluffer" you were.
I believe I merely asked how Hawkings could possibly know for an indisputable fact that God did not create the universe.
Because I like what Obama stands for? I guess that PTJ, Buffett and Soros must also "despise capitalism," eh?
Your continued lies about this, even after I made my views crystal clear, only prove you're a compulsive liar. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2925786#post2925786 Let's take a look at the thread that you started in feedback in a lame attempt to get Index Piker banned: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=194839 Well he wasn't banned and not a peep from Baron, despite your phony campaign. Why haven't you gone back onto YOUR thread to demand accountability from Baron? Why haven't you accused Baron of condoning "racism and the idea of presidential assassination"? Come on Gayfly. What's the problem?