your video... goes way off track. its starts with agnosticism...but you know it has problems when it says that that some otherwise credible dictionaries are wrong when they define atheism. No... your video is wrong when it tries to redefine atheism... it really goes off tack at around 2 minutes. its wrong because some religions don't believe in a supreme God. that is one of the sloppiest pieces of argumentation outside the crap stu slings. traditionally the definition of atheism is the doctrine that there is no diety. because that doctrine is so irrationa. modern atheist wish to soften up the defintion to be more like agnostics. which is fine... but lets not mush up the word atheist... make a new word to define your preferred view.
When it comes to fine tuning, I say what this scientist says... since I mostly learned it from this guy this 7 -10 years ago. Stu has been lying about it ever since.
...so what you should be saying is... "I thoroughly believe that real science requires explanations that do not involve supernatural agents" Leonard Susskind ..but you're just fundamentally too dishonest to say it.
I agree with that statement as well. You are just nuts on this subject stu. you have been lying about the science for years when all you have do is accept that the constants of our universe are or appear very finely tuned for life. Unless and until science were to find proof a a creator science must keep working on natural explanations. I does not make sense for science to say God did it. Because if it God did it, science should still want to know how God did it. your problem is that the mention of a Creator turns you into a irrational troll... you don't comprehend that many people of faith know the difference between faith and science.
Lol. An utterly dishonest person of faith furiously back peddling. Universe now appears fine tuned. God is not a scientific option. Only took you 10 years to concede. To be expected being a fundamentally dishonest person, your problem is you really don't know the difference between science and faith.
you are a lying moron again. your conclusion is inconsistent with what Susskind stated. Susskind said in the Video (and many other physicists have stated the same) that God is one of the options to explain the fine tuning of our universe. He states it is an option. He obviously chooses the multiverse verse conjecture instead as his preferred explanation. you are a desperate troll to write what you just wrote. and you were denying the appearance of fine tuning for years. you kept lying about what Susskind stated in his book for half a decade.