Hawking: God did not create Universe

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Free Thinker, Sep 2, 2010.

  1. jem

    jem

    B.S. by stu again.

    Very few if any scientists would argue this universe created itself... without invoking faith in the multiverse. We have done this before for hundreds of pages and about 7 years on ET and each year more and more scientists speak of the fine tunings to the point where it is a universally acknowleged argument. Some may disagree but no one acts like there is not an appearance of fine tuning to many scientists. And, few if any scientists now state we got here by random chance... without invoking faith in the multiverse.

    That we are here and the standard model is so finely tunes invokes the need for an explanation of how this universe is so finely tuned for life.

    Creator is one reasonable explanation for the incredible fine tunings but note... I am not saying it is the only possible explanation.

    To deny that a Creator is one possible explanation is childish in thought and learning.


     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2014
    #181     Dec 9, 2014
  2. It's amazing how whenever someone says something intelligent jerm calls it bullshit. Just amazing. It's like he has a highly developed sense of fine tuning out that which he does not want to hear.

    Wow, maybe jerm is the fine tuner! Scary thought.
     
    #182     Dec 9, 2014
  3. jem

    jem

    I call b.s. when someone makes claims about by science that are untrue.
    I am very familiar with the literature and books in the area as I own a few and have been debating stu and others on this since about the time Susskind's book came out.

    I have never seen any scientist state what stu claims without resorting to the multiverse. So by saying that with including the multiverse in his statement, what stu wrote is highly misleading. In the past when stu made the similar statements he cited Hawkings recent book. But all you have to do is go back a few pages and see Hawking made the quote about gravity in the context of a mulitverse with m theory.

    So stu has been bullshiting about this for years.
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2014
    #183     Dec 9, 2014
  4. achilles28

    achilles28

    That's exactly right. "Scientific" conjecture. Nothing more.
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2014
    #184     Dec 9, 2014

  5. Yeah just "scientific". What has science ever done for us?

    I just love it when dumb righties disparage knowledge. Like ignorance is better.
     
    #185     Dec 9, 2014
  6. Science has done one good thing for us. Learned how to create nuclear bombs so we can point them at each other. And of course we have already used a few to cook and bake some Japanese people.
     
    #186     Dec 10, 2014
  7. stu

    stu

    You call b.s. on everything you won't, cant or don't want to understand.

    You've never been able to debate (you're too busy calling everything you think fucks with your superstitious beliefs as bullshit), let alone grasp that, whether it's to do with one universe or multiple universes, string theory or M theory; whatever, it makes no difference.
    How the whole shebang can come about spontaneously from nothing is what modern physics is explaining.
    Sure, Creator is one possible explanation and Gravity fits that bill.
    God pointlessly begs the question.
     
    #187     Dec 10, 2014

  8. OK then, do everyone a favor and use a witch doctor the next time you get sick.

    Throw away your computer and go back to writing letters.


    What is it with you righties that you hate knowledge so much? It's like you prefer staying dumb.
     
    #188     Dec 10, 2014
  9. jem

    jem

    I might not be able to debate... but you just conceded the point about God as the possible explanation for creation, something you concede about once every 5 years. So we are done with this argument now.

     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2014
    #189     Dec 10, 2014
  10. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix


    :rolleyes:
     
    #190     Dec 10, 2014