When was the last jewish riot in England, France or anywhere else for that matter? How many buildings, cars and embassies were set on fire, how many people were killed when the president of Iran did deny holocaust and Israel's right to exist just a month ago? How can you be so dumb and proud of it?
well, i really wasnt going to post again on this thread - but seeing as your stupidity really does go beyond all known recourse, allow me to correct you. as you insist on keeping your head planted deeply in the sand, it is of no surprise to me (or the other silent majority laughing their socks off at your gaff) that you have ignored how your jewish friends in israel insist on reacting every time palestine or iran deny israels right to exist. israel start bleating like fools to the un. worse still, the israelis then start cutting off water supplies to palestinians kids, bulldozing their communities, murdering women and children etc. blah blah blah. it may have escaped your attention, but only the other week some jews started protesting when a historian denied the auschwitz death camps contained gas chambers. they had him thrown in to jail. although the jews do not riot as such (they simply start murdering vast sway of people under the name of their religion), they still complain and bleat just like you do anytime someone mentions the word 'jew'. i believe the troubles israel is causing the world with their evil activities are a little worse than a few rag heads burning a few flags and chanting slogans. dont bother calling me anti-semetic because i disagree with the actions of the israeli GOVERNMENT, because quite frankly it is tiresome, boring, and incorrect to say the least. i have heard all your prattle before and i remain unconvinced.
Brother, you are kidding yourself, full stop. You are unwiling to accept even the possibility that I may have rationally arrived at my position. Hell, you even deny that I hold a position. If that is not full blown irrationality, I don't know what is. For your information (and you are clearly in short supply of it), I am not seeking to "escape the judgement" of anyone. Yet, if you wish such judgements to be based on something more than simply "sensory organs identify[ing] things/people that you hate " - which is presicely what you are doing - then you really should take the time to find out (a) what my position is and (b) why I hold to it. Rather elementary, isn't it?
Is your position not that you hate racial minorities and things and people that are foreign to you? (xenophobia)? Is that not your stated position? Or did you forget you said that? That is what I attribute to you as a 'position'. I made that perfectly clear but you are now trying to somehow evade that. In this you share a problem with Z - everything is in the record. The damn search function, huh? Please enlighten us as to the rational evolution of your beliefs. Oh, I see. You don't have to explain yourself to a moonbat like me, right? Right? Racist scum.
That was spoken in jest (mostly). The reason I said that was because I inevitably get charged with it. I would just prefer to get all the name calling out of the way and simply debate the facts. I won't deny that I take "controversial" positions on race and culture, but I'd rather be shown that my position is irrational via debate, rather than having to go through the ritual of "you're a racist/no I'm not". Get it? (Honestly, I was surprised by this last post, I would have expected you to catch on yourself.) Now, I don't hate racial minorities. Having professed that I love whites, that would be supreme illogic. Afterall, whites are a huge minority in the world. But seriously, no, I don't hate people for their race. I simply think race is a very important factor that matters a great deal more than people have been led to believe. Look, I've been living in Thailand for the past month and intend to stay here another five. If I really did hate other races, why would I intentionally surround myself with one?
I see. So if you come up with something that draws the ire of both the right and left, you bail out into the old 'I was only joking' defense. Were you joking when you suggested that for a man to rape one category of woman is less reprehensible that raping another category of women? I should have expected some lame-ass excuse like this. Fucking pathetic. The fact is that nothing I could ever say to you about this quote below would ever convince you that this is a philosophically unsupportable position. If you can't see how this is illogical, who is going to be able to show you? Regarding your vacation in Thailand, how does that prove that you don't hate people who don't look like you and act like you and think like you and smell like you and harbour the same punk prejudices you do? It's weird... you seem to want to be taken seriously, but then you post contemptible garbage and invite others to out you as a moral leper. Whatever gets you through your day as a spectator.
Whatever, Nicholas. Clearly you're too immature for me to even bother with you. Last go around with you. I could just ask the same of you. I clearly find one woman more virtuous than the other, and so despoiling her by raping her is a greater offense than similarly despoiling one who has already discarded any sense of virtue. If you can't see this, who can show you? Obviously you can dismiss me as a raving lunatic (though it's you who rants and raves) on the basis of my position being deeply unpopular in a west that has had liberalism thrust down its throat. Yet, turn the clock back but fifty years and my position would be completely uncontroversial. Naturally, liberals would claim moral evolution has taken place. I would term it moral devolution. Isn' that obvious? Perhaps I've overrated you. People generally don't enjoy being in the company of people they hate; so if I truly did hate other races, why would I want to spend any more time than I had to around them?
Enough said. I couldn't hope for a more eloquent and accurate description of your way of 'thinking'. How simple it all is for you - in this I envy you. Sure, I'm too immature for you to deal with. Or too liberal. Or too black. Or too Oriental. Or too gay. Or too foreign. Or maybe it's just too difficult to counter the easy dismantling of your positions. No one likes to be forced into a corner. Just to let you know, the relative virtue of the victim doesn't have anything to do with the moral censure that the perpetrator of a violent act is subjected to. Okay? It doesn't matter if you say 'To me it does'. We already know that. It is amazing to me that anyone wouldn't know this; anyone, that is, that didn't indulge in a literally Victorian view of the world. Errr... oh, wait a minute. You were just a few years short in your admission above. The only people on here that are going to stand behind you on that are the other nutbags. You profess to being a good American, and yet you stand for everything that America rejects. America is about progress. You are about stagnation. Face it - you can't handle the problems that progress brings, so you turtle into your shell of easy decisions, moral perversions, racial discrimination instead of the effort required to assess each man based on his own merits, and the desire for a return to a time when everyone knew their place. But we won't. We embrace the problems that come with progress. Because progress is what put you in a position in which you can sit on a beach in Thailand and have this debate. But this is lost on you, isn't it? Hilarious how you use all the same tactics and putdowns against me that you claim your adversaries illegitimately use against you. Ever thought about that? A review of your last few posts on this thread will make it clear. It's always a giveaway when someone tells you up front about how 'everyone always calls me this so I'll save you the time'. It means that those are the labels that that person will eventually attach to you. Re: your stay in Thailand - please. As if I could possibly know how your racist mind works. Maybe you enjoy being there and lording it over the locals. Keep your enemies close, right? Do you ever read? And btw... you definitely overrated me. Talk soon, I'll be around, pointing out the fallacies and bloated prejudices in your 'opinions'.
And by the way... this uniquely disqualifies you from participating in any discussion as to whether US troops have taken needless casualties to appease the Muslims.
Racist, xenophobe, right wing extremist, bigot...and now we can add moralist, and regressive who lives 50 years in the past....or more.