Harvard Law School Seal = racist. Gone!!!!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by TreeFrogTrader, Mar 20, 2019.

  1. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    I think I do. Way more than you ever will.
     
    #71     Mar 21, 2019
  2. I see. So programs that specifically targeted minorities - affirmative action- etc. do not count because they were in the form of helping people get a leg up and to maintain because they were not offered as payment for a crime.
     
    #72     Mar 21, 2019
  3. UsualName

    UsualName

    Affirmative action in what? There is actually a consensus that affirmative action mainly benefitted white women, when it was legal.
     
    #73     Mar 21, 2019
  4. UsualName

    UsualName

    Of course you do. It’s called the confidence of ignorance.
     
    #74     Mar 21, 2019
  5. Work it out on the campaign trail.

    You have a bunch of clowns running who advocate reparations and you want to run on that.

    Go for it.
     
    #75     Mar 21, 2019
  6. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    Right. If you say so.
     
    #76     Mar 21, 2019

  7. You're right. We should get rid of everything rooted in evil. Remind me again what party started the KKK and was in support of Slavery and removal of Indians in the 1800s? Oh yeah, the democrat party. Which party confiscated(stole) all the gold in the united states in 1933 only so they could devalue it. Oh yeah, The democrat party.

    But lets get more to the ROOTs of it. Who founded the Democrat Party? Van Buren....a slave holder and a man STRONGLY against the abolishing of slavery.

    So because most people don't know the democrat party is rooted in evil, it's ok to keep it? Because...ignorance is bliss?
     
    #77     Mar 21, 2019
  8. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    None of that counts. You're only allowed to cherry pick indiscretions that fit the narrative.
     
    #78     Mar 21, 2019
    peilthetraveler likes this.
  9. UsualName

    UsualName

    From the angle of campaigning on reparations, I do disagree. This is something that if it were done, which I disagree with, it should be done as a constitutional amendment, imo.
     
    #79     Mar 21, 2019
  10. Does it hurt when you try to think?

    [​IMG]

    If so, it only makes sense that you would avoid doing so. That would explain your post(s).
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2019
    #80     Mar 21, 2019