I would image Stormy would say she was offered money to not say anything about her relationship with Trump and he twas trying to tie up a lose end. I’m sure Stormy understood that she would face at least a civil suit by Trump and certaintly has guarentees by some entity regarding legal costs along with a compensation package.
So Stormy considers a drug addicted male prostitute from outer space as better person than a church goer? Wonder how much of an impact this will have on her credibility? I’m going to assume she was under the influence when she made this statement. As the song goes, Stormy may want to put away the crack, before the crack puts her away.
That may be so. However, what does that imply these stalwarts of our community thought about Hillary? Stormy has just trashed her credibility and I’m sure her own lawyers are reminding her of her right to silence and to use that right in the public domain. Stormy needs to be credible because she has apparently breached a non-disclosure agreement with Trump. Stormy’s possible assertion that she did it for the “greater good” is severely diminished. In addition, less people will be pulling for her as they are less likely see her “good” person, regardless of her profession. Juries have a very strong tendency to take their duties seriously, well beyond what you normally find on social media, and will likely assign great weight on Stormy’s recent comment. She shot herself and any related cause in the foot with this comment to the gain of Trump.
Everyone, including leftists know she's in it to make a buck. The question it's whether the NDA is valid since he didn't sign it. Additionally, if the fundsf used were illegal, and if intimidation was used against her.
In any normal jurisdiction the rule of contracts would be the agreement only need be signed by the party being asked to perform. Especially if the other party has already performed. Trump side performed when they paid. so in general her lawyer's argument is trash. I suspect that in order to talk cnn or some other group agreed to indemnify her against any damages she might suffer in a lawsuit.
My guess is the NDA is still enforceable because in consideration for Stormy to receive money, she was to not disclose. The side that payed the money had no additional duties to perform, thus it might be considered a unilateral contract not requiring both signatures. Unless there is actual proof of intimidation, there should will be no effect on the case. The strongest part of the case appears to be the source of funds. However, I would be suprised if the Trump team would deliberately risk a violation, especially over such a small amount of money. Why would the Trump team pay to avoid political complications while at the same time risk creating another political complication by their method of payment? I’m sure this is not the Trump’s team first rodeo in business or politics.
I'm sure her spending the money won't help her case, but Trump isn't helping himself attacking the post for reporting on the story.https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/31/trump-amazon-post-office-jeff-bezos-492853
Trump Breaks Silence on Stormy Daniels: I Did Not Know About Lawyer’s $130,000 Payment https://www.mediaite.com/online/its...alling-donald-trump-what-he-is-a-fcking-liar/ Even his lying is getting pathetic So... Michael Cohen took it upon himself to mortgage his house and make a payment to a Porn Star to keep her mouth shut (signed NDA) about an affair with the President, which he knew nothing about and does not know how it was paid. Also... The President (who knows nothing about an NDA) joins a lawsuit suing a Porn Star about an NDA (which he knows nothing about and how it was paid). happens all the time