ETH is a different use case. You say the others are "better" yet all they have done is depreciate against bitcoin ... maybe there is a reason for this!
LOL.. what a joke. Look at how the hashrate keeps rising for bitcoin mining, even in this bear market, and then ask if all of these miners are stupid or maybe they know something you don't!
Just stating a fact, dude. They are all TECHNOLOGICALLY better. Since you referred to price, that makes you a cultist, who doesn't even care about technology, nothing else. And yes, there is a reason for it, nobody gives a shit about crypto as technology, they all are just greedy ponzi pushers.
Price (and by extension market cap) certainly matters tho. Especially for a crypto that is trying to be money (aka bitcoin, btc sv, btc cash, litecoin). Its an obvious marker of adoption. Nobody cares about the other bitcoin forks is what I am trying to relay to ya, and that is crystal clear by the performance. We have had this tech discussion many times before ... bitcoin prioritized decentralization and security at the base layer, with scalability/speed on the second layer (lightning), which I know you totally dismiss for some reason that remains unclear. But go ahead and just say its a Ponzi. This 14-year Ponzi still lives I guess, its almost like this ponzi is different than the rest from history...
All other shits... BNB BCASH SV ETH .... they are centralized... only BTC is the real. If BNB can stop blockchain ... you can imagine how is decentralized
I wonder if it is a purely psychological thing with investors that side with Bitcoin as it is the oldest of a risky asset class and therefore seen as more trusted and that others that take that model and expand on it are discarded by comparison purely on the crime of being "newer".