Hannah Montana "topless" photo rocks Disney?

You must understand, she had no choice what so ever. Disney "owns" her and her father. When they say, you're doing a photo shoot, she must do the photo shoot, regardless.

Yes, its tacky, I had high hopes for this kid, still do.

Don't even think for one minute that every single executive that is part of this kid's life did not know in advance, and completely sign off on this. Disney has billions at stake here, and hundreds of perversely paid lawyers to protect it. Vanity Fair magazine. (Who??)

 

That maybe, BUT, a parent has an obligation to protect their child, whatever the finacial or legal consequences.

 

1. What is Vanity Fair Thinking? $

2. Better question - Why is Mr. Cyrus, who is already getting a ton of $ with this Hanna Montana ride - okay with this?

3. Even better question (IMO) as it pertains to ET ... Where did this thread come from? How is Disney "rocked" when it is trading above Friday's close?

 

The pedos on Wall St think it's a buy?

 

This makes a lot of sense. You're probably right about that.

 

Wrong, Disney didn't find out about this photo or the shoot until the story broke on Entertainment Tonight (the other ET).

 

Holy CRAP! I thought that was going to be the North American Marlon Brando Look Alike.org..

 

Yeah, that guy "turkeyneck" has got some splainnin to do.

 

liberals.

It's a Mental Disorder (c) Savage

 

What will the catholic church concoct next?

(or would they spell it con-cocked)