We have went over this but you choose to ignore it .The difference between what was requested and was was enacted was Bushs accounting tricks of projecting more tax revenue then he knew he would receive and not putting the war cost in his budget http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_United_States_federal_budget "With projected receipts less than projected outlays, the budget proposed by President Bush predicts a net deficit of approximately $400 billion dollars, adding to a United States governmental debt of about $11.4 trillion. Actual tax receipts totaled approximately $2.1 trillion - significantly less than the $2.7 trillion expected" "The financial cost of the Iraq War and the War in Afghanistan are not part of the defense budget; they are appropriations." 1.Bush submits budget with 400 billion dollar deficit,revenue was 600 billion less then Bush projected so now the deficit is a trillion(Bush accounting tricks) 2.The Iraq and Afghan wars were not part of Bushs official budget (Bush accounting tricks)so the costs of those wars are added to the trillion dollar deficit
Once again reality is not on your side, are you actually trying to claim that the dems spent nothing in 2009?!?!?! LOL too funny
Bush projects 600 billion more tax revenue then the US receives and keeps 2 wars off the books and you think its democratic spending...LOL too funny
AK doesn't get it. The $800+ Billion in stimulus was just poof - I guess slid under the rug. As was the Trillion dollar Omnibus bill, the $400 billion TARP and everything else the democrats did in the first half of 2009.
The lower tax receits due to tax cuts within the stimulus were. 410 billion dollar 2009 omnibus spending bill which was passed with just 20 republican votes was.... The House of Representatives version of the bill includes $410 billion in spending.[2] This includes a 21 percent increase to a program that feeds infants and poor women, an 8 percent increase to the Section 8 voucher program, a 13 percent increase to the Agriculture Department, a 10 percent increase in Amtrak subsidies, a 10 percent increase in Congress's budget, a 12 percent increase in the Department of State budget and foreign aid, and eliminated spending for the Millennium Challenge Corporation.[2]
Obama did not cut taxes by the 600 billion Bush came up short and the stimulus is spread out over multiple years
Yeah, we had lower tax receipts then projected due to tax cuts by the obama administration.... that doesnt mean 600 billion less you idiot.... btw the wars in afghanistan and iraq were costing at a max 200 billion so where is the extra 300 billion in spending coming from? I suppose none of that was Obama's fault either was it?